Tools & Wizards About Us
argument-studio.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

argument-studio.ru

Курсы риторики в ораторской школе Аргументъ

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

814 ms

Resources Loaded

4.3 sec

Page Rendered

360 ms

argument-studio.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to argument-studio.ru homepage info - get ready to check Argument Studio best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about argument-studio.ru

Курсы риторики, индивидуальные занятия ораторским искусством, риторика для детей, риторика онлайн, коммуникативная эффективность руководителей.

Visit argument-studio.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Argument-studio.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 814 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

argument-studio.ru performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

22/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value250 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.137

79/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

64/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

argument-studio.ru

814 ms

www.argument-studio.ru

1048 ms

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

18 ms

style.css

174 ms

style.css

309 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Argument-studio.ru, 4% (2 requests) were made to Wprp.zemanta.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Argument-studio.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 111.8 kB (18%)

Content Size

633.9 kB

After Optimization

522.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Argument-studio.ru main page is 633.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 474.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 49.4 kB

  • Original 63.0 kB
  • After minification 56.2 kB
  • After compression 13.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.8 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 33.2 kB

  • Original 474.5 kB
  • After minification 441.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Argument Studio images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 22.1 kB

  • Original 79.3 kB
  • After minification 78.8 kB
  • After compression 57.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 28% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 17.1 kB
  • After minification 16.6 kB
  • After compression 9.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Argument-studio.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.2 kB or 42% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (18%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

42

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Argument Studio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

argument-studio.ru

argument-studio.ru

814 ms

www.argument-studio.ru

www.argument-studio.ru

1048 ms

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

jquery-1.11.2.min.js

18 ms

style.css

style.css

174 ms

style.css

style.css

309 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

407 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

32 ms

include.js

include.js

433 ms

loader.js

loader.js

9 ms

pinterest.css

pinterest.css

424 ms

es5-shims.min.js

es5-shims.min.js

693 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

441 ms

pinterest.js

pinterest.js

421 ms

drone.js

drone.js

447 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

350 ms

bg-126.png

bg-126.png

136 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

114 ms

argument.png

argument.png

156 ms

sbox.png

sbox.png

143 ms

oratorskie-kursyM.jpg

oratorskie-kursyM.jpg

224 ms

individualnye-zanyatiyaM.jpg

individualnye-zanyatiyaM.jpg

280 ms

presentationM.jpg

presentationM.jpg

183 ms

detskaya-ritorikaM.jpg

detskaya-ritorikaM.jpg

272 ms

onlineM.jpg

onlineM.jpg

347 ms

saleM.jpg

saleM.jpg

360 ms

groupM.jpg

groupM.jpg

376 ms

negotiationM.jpg

negotiationM.jpg

414 ms

iskusstvo-sporaM.jpg

iskusstvo-sporaM.jpg

465 ms

meetingM.jpg

meetingM.jpg

470 ms

supportM.jpg

supportM.jpg

540 ms

speechwritingM.jpg

speechwritingM.jpg

549 ms

chiefM.jpg

chiefM.jpg

568 ms

eventM.jpg

eventM.jpg

601 ms

coachingM.jpg

coachingM.jpg

656 ms

01.png

01.png

611 ms

02.png

02.png

691 ms

03.png

03.png

702 ms

04.png

04.png

715 ms

05.png

05.png

740 ms

06.png

06.png

748 ms

07.png

07.png

821 ms

08.png

08.png

831 ms

09.png

09.png

867 ms

10.png

10.png

909 ms

11.png

11.png

881 ms

12.png

12.png

890 ms

13.png

13.png

977 ms

14.png

14.png

989 ms

15.png

15.png

1016 ms

16.png

16.png

1037 ms

17.png

17.png

1050 ms

symbol-defs.svg

symbol-defs.svg

1078 ms

goup.png

goup.png

1114 ms

watch.js

watch.js

82 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

6 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

1016 ms

Accessibility Review

argument-studio.ru accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

argument-studio.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

argument-studio.ru SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Argument-studio.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Argument-studio.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

argument-studio.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Argument Studio. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: