Tools & Wizards About Us
aristocut.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

aristocut.com

Home - Efalock Professional Tools GmbH

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

320 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

134 ms

aristocut.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to aristocut.com homepage info - get ready to check Aristocut best content right away, or after learning these important things about aristocut.com

Hier kommt eine Beschreibung hin

Visit aristocut.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Aristocut.com page load time and found that the first response time was 320 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Aristocut.com rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

aristocut.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.28

43/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

aristocut.com

320 ms

www.aristocut.de

514 ms

errorpage-message.css

103 ms

typo3logo-white-greyback.gif

188 ms

gray-gradient.png

213 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Aristocut.com, 88% (7 requests) were made to Aristocut.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (514 ms) relates to the external source Aristocut.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 6.0 kB (23%)

Content Size

25.8 kB

After Optimization

19.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Aristocut.com main page is 25.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 21.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 834 B

  • Original 1.8 kB
  • After minification 1.7 kB
  • After compression 935 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 834 B or 47% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

  • Original 21.7 kB
  • After minification 18.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Aristocut needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 2.4 kB
  • After minification 2.1 kB
  • After compression 701 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aristocut.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 71% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aristocut. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

aristocut.com

aristocut.com

320 ms

www.aristocut.de

www.aristocut.de

514 ms

errorpage-message.css

errorpage-message.css

103 ms

typo3logo-white-greyback.gif

typo3logo-white-greyback.gif

188 ms

gray-gradient.png

gray-gradient.png

213 ms

box-top-428.png

box-top-428.png

179 ms

dialog-error.png

dialog-error.png

186 ms

box-bottom-424.png

box-bottom-424.png

187 ms

Accessibility Review

aristocut.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

aristocut.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

aristocut.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aristocut.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Aristocut.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

aristocut.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Aristocut. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: