8.4 sec in total
2.8 sec
5.1 sec
538 ms
Welcome to armr.in homepage info - get ready to check ARMR best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about armr.in
Shop Online for Sports Training Gear in India - ARMR Store I Buy Skins range, Compressions Garments, Gym Supporters, Gloves, Socks and Sports Accessories
Visit armr.inWe analyzed Armr.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2.8 sec and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
armr.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.5 s
1/100
10%
Value13.9 s
0/100
25%
Value37.0 s
0/100
10%
Value350 ms
73/100
30%
Value0.426
22/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
2751 ms
166 ms
172 ms
173 ms
167 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (83 requests) were addressed to the original Armr.in, 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Armr.in.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (33%)
4.3 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Armr.in main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 74.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ARMR images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 807.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 807.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 519.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Armr.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 519.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (73%)
85
23
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ARMR. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.armr.in
2751 ms
default.css
166 ms
owl.carousel.css
172 ms
owl.transitions.css
173 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
167 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.css
168 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
181 ms
jqtransform.css
245 ms
bootstrap.min.css
489 ms
font-awesome.min.css
327 ms
style.css
580 ms
style.css
256 ms
widgets.css
269 ms
magento.css
328 ms
style.css
345 ms
quickview.css
360 ms
theme-ED7000.css
807 ms
custom_style.css
499 ms
settings.css
522 ms
revolution-customs.css
458 ms
prototype.js
920 ms
ccard.js
570 ms
validation.js
659 ms
builder.js
613 ms
effects.js
657 ms
dragdrop.js
662 ms
controls.js
705 ms
slider.js
745 ms
js.js
742 ms
form.js
746 ms
menu.js
795 ms
translate.js
837 ms
cookies.js
837 ms
jquery.js
943 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
886 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
886 ms
css
25 ms
jquery.easing.js
874 ms
bootstrap.min.js
759 ms
window.js
907 ms
scriptaculous.js
814 ms
product.js
844 ms
calendar.js
851 ms
calendar-setup.js
831 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
769 ms
jquery.plugin.min.js
803 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
822 ms
bootstrap-tabdrop.js
766 ms
jquery.jqtransform.js
767 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
766 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.js
780 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
701 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
675 ms
msrp.js
674 ms
bundle.js
654 ms
sns-ajaxcart.js
632 ms
twitterfetcher-min.js
641 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.min.js
638 ms
sns-extend.js
596 ms
sns-script.js
597 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
609 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
678 ms
sound.js
230 ms
analytics.js
31 ms
pattern_0.png
96 ms
logo.png
95 ms
57b1aef2a8634fabaa38a63d2a5fe60a.png
192 ms
d7ef932225ec9d8edbdcb19a02d05727.png
194 ms
aire_-_nav.png
193 ms
skin.png
432 ms
aire.png
535 ms
sport.png
635 ms
home_page_main.jpg
284 ms
banner_side.jpg
288 ms
banner_left.jpg
217 ms
silvertech.png
409 ms
protrainlogo.png
369 ms
strat_icon.png
377 ms
training.png
458 ms
win.png
468 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
19 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
518 ms
collect
14 ms
timer.png
489 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
490 ms
loader.gif
384 ms
print.css
94 ms
armr.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
armr.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
armr.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Armr.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Armr.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
armr.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ARMR. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: