Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 55

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

armstrongcentre.com

The Gift Shop – by Armstrongcentre

Page Load Speed

5.6 sec in total

First Response

612 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

787 ms

armstrongcentre.com screenshot

About Website

Visit armstrongcentre.com now to see the best up-to-date Armstrongcentre content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about armstrongcentre.com

Visit armstrongcentre.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Armstrongcentre.com page load time and found that the first response time was 612 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

armstrongcentre.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.058

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

armstrongcentre.com

612 ms

armstrongshop.com

857 ms

colorbox.css

301 ms

jquery.autocomplete.css

306 ms

main.css

929 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Armstrongcentre.com, 99% (71 requests) were made to Armstrongshop.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Armstrongshop.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 249.2 kB (24%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

787.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Armstrongcentre.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 771.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 88 B
  • After minification 88 B
  • After compression 76 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12 B or 14% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 37.6 kB

  • Original 771.8 kB
  • After minification 734.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Armstrongcentre images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 80.3 kB

  • Original 112.2 kB
  • After minification 97.2 kB
  • After compression 31.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 80.3 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 131.2 kB

  • Original 152.9 kB
  • After minification 129.2 kB
  • After compression 21.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Armstrongcentre.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 131.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (24%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

54

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Armstrongcentre. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Best Practices

armstrongcentre.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

armstrongcentre.com SEO score

55

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Armstrongcentre.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Armstrongcentre.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Armstrongcentre. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: