4.5 sec in total
1.4 sec
2.8 sec
344 ms
Click here to check amazing Armstrong Monitoring content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about armstrongmonitoring.com
Armstrong Monitoring is a leading provider of gas detection solutions. We have been providing gas monitoring systems and service since 1981.
Visit armstrongmonitoring.comWe analyzed Armstrongmonitoring.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
armstrongmonitoring.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value4.6 s
36/100
25%
Value14.4 s
1/100
10%
Value7,200 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.14
79/100
15%
Value23.6 s
1/100
10%
1353 ms
36 ms
105 ms
72 ms
119 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Armstrongmonitoring.com, 22% (16 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 18% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Armstrongmonitoring.com.
Page size can be reduced by 647.5 kB (34%)
1.9 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Armstrongmonitoring.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 687.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 463.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 463.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 169.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Armstrong Monitoring needs image optimization as it can save up to 169.9 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 317 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 14.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Armstrongmonitoring.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.0 kB or 15% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (87%)
46
6
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Armstrong Monitoring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
armstrongmonitoring.com
1353 ms
css
36 ms
qcw5oqf.css
105 ms
js
72 ms
style.min.css
119 ms
public.css
177 ms
qcw5oqf.css
200 ms
oxygen.css
177 ms
job-listings.css
179 ms
dashicons.min.css
183 ms
frontend.css
180 ms
public.min.css
180 ms
wpstg-admin-all-pages.min.css
235 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
237 ms
jquery.min.js
241 ms
all.js
452 ms
public.min.js
237 ms
wpstg-blank-loader.js
238 ms
wpstg-admin-all-pages.min.js
238 ms
998.css
294 ms
997.css
294 ms
6.css
296 ms
910.css
295 ms
universal.css
299 ms
widget.js
732 ms
aos.css
322 ms
jquery.datetimepicker.min.css
397 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
397 ms
aos.js
396 ms
ws-form.min.js
405 ms
ws-form-public-captcha.min.js
405 ms
ws-form-public.min.js
447 ms
core.min.js
493 ms
mouse.min.js
492 ms
sortable.min.js
495 ms
jquery.ui.touch-punch.js
513 ms
dropzone.min.js
571 ms
ws-form-public-file.min.js
522 ms
jquery.inputmask.min.js
571 ms
jquery.datetimepicker.full.min.js
569 ms
ws-form-public-conditional.min.js
569 ms
ws-form-public-date.min.js
569 ms
p.css
27 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
174 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVQ.woff
194 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
195 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
195 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
195 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
193 ms
d
190 ms
d
124 ms
d
124 ms
d
140 ms
d
192 ms
d
173 ms
d
190 ms
circuit-patter-white.png
588 ms
UTx-Banner-05-3.png
444 ms
circuit-pattern-01-01.png
554 ms
d
124 ms
d
332 ms
d
123 ms
d
169 ms
d
171 ms
d
170 ms
d
169 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uz.woff
115 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uz.woff
119 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFV0Uz.woff
117 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-FV0Uz.woff
119 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uz.woff
119 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-FV0Uz.woff
120 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FV0Uz.woff
119 ms
AMC-logo-white-VECTOR.svg
282 ms
armstrongmonitoring.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
armstrongmonitoring.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
armstrongmonitoring.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Armstrongmonitoring.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Armstrongmonitoring.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
armstrongmonitoring.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Armstrong Monitoring. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: