1.4 sec in total
84 ms
1.1 sec
240 ms
Visit army.net now to see the best up-to-date Army content for Malaysia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about army.net
Submit an Article Go to Article Important News Share » Read more about: Home »
Visit army.netWe analyzed Army.net page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
army.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value5.1 s
25/100
25%
Value5.8 s
49/100
10%
Value420 ms
66/100
30%
Value0.728
6/100
15%
Value9.6 s
29/100
10%
84 ms
19 ms
34 ms
28 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Army.net, 11% (6 requests) were made to Google.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Cse.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (112 ms) belongs to the original domain Army.net.
Page size can be reduced by 101.2 kB (24%)
416.3 kB
315.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Army.net main page is 416.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 164.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Army images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 36.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Army.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (85%)
48
7
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Army. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
army.net
84 ms
style.min.css
19 ms
style.min.css
34 ms
theme.min.css
28 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
37 ms
post-5.css
35 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
30 ms
swiper.min.css
29 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
35 ms
global.css
44 ms
post-19.css
42 ms
post-15.css
42 ms
post-13.css
44 ms
fontawesome.min.css
52 ms
regular.min.css
49 ms
solid.min.css
50 ms
jquery.min.js
66 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
59 ms
css
44 ms
cse.js
64 ms
widget-posts.min.css
59 ms
widget-share-buttons.min.css
59 ms
brands.min.css
60 ms
animations.min.css
59 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
60 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
60 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
100 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
101 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
102 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
101 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
101 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
109 ms
hooks.min.js
109 ms
i18n.min.js
110 ms
frontend.min.js
110 ms
waypoints.min.js
110 ms
core.min.js
111 ms
frontend.min.js
111 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
112 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
100 ms
cropped-News-new-logo.jpg
30 ms
cse_element__en.js
33 ms
default+en.css
60 ms
minimalist.css
61 ms
async-ads.js
82 ms
branding.png
24 ms
clear.png
23 ms
nav_logo114.png
43 ms
font
48 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
23 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
61 ms
eicons.woff
41 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
61 ms
army.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
army.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
army.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Army.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Army.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
army.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Army. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: