Tools & Wizards About Us
arnita.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

arnita.in

Arnita Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | Architects in Mumbai | SEZ Consultant Mumbai | India

Page Load Speed

8.3 sec in total

First Response

525 ms

Resources Loaded

7.4 sec

Page Rendered

355 ms

arnita.in screenshot

About Website

Visit arnita.in now to see the best up-to-date Arnita content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about arnita.in

Arnita Consultants offer Architectural and Engineering Design services to various Industries like Pharmaceuticals, Bio technology, Labs, R & D, Residential, Logistics, etc.

Visit arnita.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Arnita.in page load time and found that the first response time was 525 ms and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

arnita.in performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.719

6/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

arnita.in

525 ms

arnita.in

1648 ms

loader.min.css

614 ms

bootstrap.min.css

853 ms

font-awesome.min.css

205 ms

Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (87 requests) were addressed to the original Arnita.in, 10% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Arnita.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 145.8 kB (12%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Arnita.in main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 832.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 92.7 kB

  • Original 101.8 kB
  • After minification 61.0 kB
  • After compression 9.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 40.8 kB, which is 40% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.7 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 30.2 kB

  • Original 832.4 kB
  • After minification 802.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Arnita images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 210.8 kB
  • After minification 210.8 kB
  • After compression 202.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 14.7 kB

  • Original 80.8 kB
  • After minification 80.8 kB
  • After compression 66.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Arnita.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.7 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (33%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

58

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Arnita. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

arnita.in

arnita.in

525 ms

arnita.in

arnita.in

1648 ms

loader.min.css

loader.min.css

614 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

853 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

205 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

206 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

231 ms

style.css

style.css

616 ms

rev-slider-4.css

rev-slider-4.css

413 ms

settings.css

settings.css

453 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

602 ms

css

css

34 ms

css

css

53 ms

css

css

58 ms

logo-dark1.png

logo-dark1.png

814 ms

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

jquery-1.12.4.min.js

835 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

712 ms

magnific-popup.min.js

magnific-popup.min.js

711 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

801 ms

counterup.min.js

counterup.min.js

805 ms

waypoints-sticky.min.js

waypoints-sticky.min.js

885 ms

isotope.pkgd.min.js

isotope.pkgd.min.js

907 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1016 ms

jquery.owl-filter.js

jquery.owl-filter.js

1012 ms

stellar.min.js

stellar.min.js

1018 ms

scrolla.min.js

scrolla.min.js

1040 ms

particles.js

particles.js

1105 ms

app.js

app.js

1129 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1231 ms

shortcode.js

shortcode.js

1229 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

1457 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

1271 ms

revolution-plugin.js

revolution-plugin.js

1566 ms

rev-script-3.js

rev-script-3.js

1358 ms

video2.jpg

video2.jpg

2043 ms

01.webp

01.webp

4590 ms

02.webp

02.webp

2540 ms

03.webp

03.webp

2754 ms

04.webp

04.webp

1937 ms

05.webp

05.webp

2440 ms

pic1.webp

pic1.webp

2139 ms

pic16.webp

pic16.webp

2256 ms

pic19.webp

pic19.webp

2339 ms

pic2.webp

pic2.webp

2292 ms

pic9.webp

pic9.webp

2361 ms

pic17.webp

pic17.webp

2434 ms

pic3.webp

pic3.webp

2312 ms

pic10.webp

pic10.webp

2307 ms

pic18.webp

pic18.webp

2179 ms

pic4.webp

pic4.webp

2178 ms

pic11.webp

pic11.webp

2215 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

15 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

19 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

34 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

39 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

39 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

40 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

40 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

2484 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyWyosBO5Xk.ttf

55 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xk.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyXsosBO5Xk.ttf

40 ms

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf

ieVo2ZhZI2eCN5jzbjEETS9weq8-_d6T_POl0fRJeyVVpcBO5Xk.ttf

55 ms

pic20.webp

pic20.webp

2472 ms

pic5.webp

pic5.webp

2399 ms

pic12.webp

pic12.webp

2304 ms

pic21.webp

pic21.webp

2295 ms

pic6.webp

pic6.webp

2470 ms

pic13.webp

pic13.webp

2448 ms

pic22.webp

pic22.webp

2405 ms

pic7.webp

pic7.webp

2407 ms

pic14.webp

pic14.webp

2485 ms

pic23.webp

pic23.webp

2552 ms

pic8.webp

pic8.webp

2474 ms

pic15.webp

pic15.webp

2506 ms

client_1.png

client_1.png

2401 ms

client_2.png

client_2.png

2510 ms

client_3.png

client_3.png

2513 ms

client_4.png

client_4.png

2444 ms

client_5.png

client_5.png

2367 ms

client_6.png

client_6.png

2156 ms

client_7.png

client_7.png

2032 ms

client_8.png

client_8.png

1939 ms

client_9.png

client_9.png

1885 ms

client_10.png

client_10.png

1792 ms

client_11.png

client_11.png

1722 ms

client_12.png

client_12.png

1763 ms

client_13.png

client_13.png

1702 ms

client_14.png

client_14.png

1709 ms

client_15.png

client_15.png

1719 ms

client_16.png

client_16.png

1631 ms

client_17.png

client_17.png

1681 ms

client_18.png

client_18.png

1702 ms

client_19.png

client_19.png

1720 ms

client_20.png

client_20.png

1712 ms

logo-dark1a.png

logo-dark1a.png

1636 ms

ptn-1.png

ptn-1.png

1681 ms

pic2.jpg

pic2.jpg

1728 ms

pic1.jpg

pic1.jpg

1696 ms

pic1.jpg

pic1.jpg

1819 ms

bg-11.jpg

bg-11.jpg

2005 ms

Accessibility Review

arnita.in accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

arnita.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

arnita.in SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arnita.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Arnita.in main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

arnita.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Arnita. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: