3 sec in total
722 ms
1.9 sec
343 ms
Visit arqiva.com now to see the best up-to-date Arqiva content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about arqiva.com
We operate at the heart of the TV, Radio, Satellite Data Communications and Smart Metering industries.
Visit arqiva.comWe analyzed Arqiva.com page load time and found that the first response time was 722 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
arqiva.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value8.9 s
1/100
25%
Value5.8 s
50/100
10%
Value300 ms
78/100
30%
Value0.096
91/100
15%
Value8.1 s
41/100
10%
722 ms
407 ms
30 ms
228 ms
163 ms
Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Arqiva.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (722 ms) belongs to the original domain Arqiva.com.
Page size can be reduced by 96.7 kB (18%)
523.1 kB
426.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Arqiva.com main page is 523.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 412.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Arqiva images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 40.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 40.2 kB or 53% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (18%)
39
32
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Arqiva. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.arqiva.com
722 ms
style.css
407 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
jquery-ui-1.11.4-custom.min.js
228 ms
modernizr.custom.97458.js
163 ms
core.js
441 ms
ga.js
50 ms
leads.js
89 ms
385604.js
50 ms
gplus-32.png
37 ms
arqiva-logo.png
166 ms
transparent.gif
111 ms
search-button.png
124 ms
ed065485-cad9-47c5-9aae-f651d7e48d53.png
147 ms
b00e268f-5c3d-4e82-9805-8b0ab9decaec.jpg
331 ms
icons.png
166 ms
fde65d49-2725-4b72-ac8e-968dd2bbd71a.png
245 ms
c895c8f9-99ca-4e05-932a-5f09eadacb43.jpg
294 ms
536d8df6-aaa5-4ddf-9d8b-3f7680414fda.jpg
231 ms
4b9c0423-9a5b-4cbb-8686-0c12335b86f4.png
250 ms
4ec53150-d538-4522-a36f-f54e8ad4cb68.jpg
258 ms
grid-1-col.jpg
308 ms
35782758-9c17-413a-ad6b-d495b1ce168b.jpg
335 ms
b858711b-539d-4613-950e-1e9c14ccf5ad.jpg
340 ms
2780f10b-52b1-4244-8e46-6bf4727b7c56.jpg
347 ms
c7e0c2bf-c2dc-43b4-b38e-5a5d0f036cd5.jpg
384 ms
dfedd70f-5de7-466d-bb87-970357f3dcac.jpg
393 ms
3058d9c1-675b-498d-858b-1593664829cc.jpg
419 ms
ce18cd8b-b7ae-4801-b744-ce16776e83ef.jpg
424 ms
70150e5b-f105-46be-8a2b-35e9c67005b3.jpg
431 ms
127b6eee-0108-43be-aac1-1dc84da50c1c.jpg
436 ms
69124a65-2814-46ce-b614-d165b55310fd.jpg
474 ms
grid-1-col-purple.jpg
471 ms
e0d7c134-1a75-4e5f-a8fe-9ad2ddd7b64a.jpg
509 ms
social.png
504 ms
__utm.gif
41 ms
Capture.aspx
91 ms
webfont.js
53 ms
fonts.css
374 ms
fs-albert-web.woff
79 ms
fs-albert-web-bold.woff
85 ms
__ptq.gif
26 ms
arqiva.com accessibility score
arqiva.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
arqiva.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arqiva.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Arqiva.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
arqiva.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Arqiva. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: