Tools & Wizards About Us
arrangingpixels.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

arrangingpixels.com

Branding & Custom WordPress Website Design for Small Business

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

66 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

450 ms

arrangingpixels.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Arrangingpixels content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about arrangingpixels.com

Running a Small Business? Get Big City ad agency look on an small business budget. Logos, Business Cards, Wordpress Websites & more

Visit arrangingpixels.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Arrangingpixels.com page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

arrangingpixels.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,490 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.1 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

arrangingpixels.com

66 ms

www.brandco.com

257 ms

brandco.com

434 ms

ltf3dpt.js

56 ms

style.min.css

47 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Arrangingpixels.com, 64% (42 requests) were made to Brandco.com and 17% (11 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (434 ms) relates to the external source Brandco.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 158.6 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Arrangingpixels.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 136.7 kB

  • Original 165.6 kB
  • After minification 155.6 kB
  • After compression 29.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 136.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 14.7 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Arrangingpixels images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 49.9 kB
  • After minification 49.9 kB
  • After compression 42.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.2 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (83%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Arrangingpixels. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

arrangingpixels.com

arrangingpixels.com

66 ms

www.brandco.com

www.brandco.com

257 ms

brandco.com

brandco.com

434 ms

ltf3dpt.js

ltf3dpt.js

56 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

47 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

94 ms

flatpickr.min.css

flatpickr.min.css

65 ms

select2.min.css

select2.min.css

78 ms

style.css

style.css

97 ms

css

css

46 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

67 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

87 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

94 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

113 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

175 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

124 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

126 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

126 ms

flatpickr.min.js

flatpickr.min.js

126 ms

select2.min.js

select2.min.js

143 ms

v4-shims.min.js

v4-shims.min.js

151 ms

v2.js

v2.js

63 ms

441584.js

441584.js

61 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

159 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

172 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

160 ms

jquery.mixitup.min.js

jquery.mixitup.min.js

352 ms

typed.js

typed.js

353 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

355 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

354 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

356 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

357 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

356 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

366 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

356 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

366 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

371 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

365 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

371 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

373 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

411 ms

441584.js

441584.js

88 ms

property-press-logo@2x.png

property-press-logo@2x.png

362 ms

acsb.js

acsb.js

182 ms

homepage_01.jpg

homepage_01.jpg

129 ms

bco_home_featured_bg2.jpg

bco_home_featured_bg2.jpg

129 ms

bco_home_featured_device.png

bco_home_featured_device.png

203 ms

HomepageGraphic_PP_06.png

HomepageGraphic_PP_06.png

201 ms

HomepageGraphic_PP_03.png

HomepageGraphic_PP_03.png

204 ms

fb.js

fb.js

202 ms

441584.js

441584.js

267 ms

conversations-embed.js

conversations-embed.js

202 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

196 ms

banner.js

banner.js

231 ms

i

i

54 ms

i

i

199 ms

i

i

126 ms

i

i

126 ms

acsb.js

acsb.js

223 ms

i

i

121 ms

i

i

103 ms

i

i

104 ms

i

i

246 ms

i

i

137 ms

i

i

137 ms

homepage_03.jpg

homepage_03.jpg

85 ms

Accessibility Review

arrangingpixels.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

arrangingpixels.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

arrangingpixels.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arrangingpixels.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Arrangingpixels.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

arrangingpixels.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Arrangingpixels. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: