Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

arraystone.com

Array Stone – Crafting Timeless Stones For Your Dream Project

Page Load Speed

33.7 sec in total

First Response

14.2 sec

Resources Loaded

17.6 sec

Page Rendered

2 sec

arraystone.com screenshot

About Website

Visit arraystone.com now to see the best up-to-date Array Stone content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about arraystone.com

Visit arraystone.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Arraystone.com page load time and found that the first response time was 14.2 sec and then it took 19.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

arraystone.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value12.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value26.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value30.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,220 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

arraystone.com

14189 ms

main.css

329 ms

woocommerce.min.css

297 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

218 ms

inavii-styles.min.css

256 ms

Our browser made a total of 136 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (108 requests) were addressed to the original Arraystone.com, 13% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (14.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Arraystone.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 637.1 kB (9%)

Content Size

6.8 MB

After Optimization

6.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Arraystone.com main page is 6.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 183.1 kB

  • Original 226.3 kB
  • After minification 218.0 kB
  • After compression 43.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 183.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 146.4 kB

  • Original 5.2 MB
  • After minification 5.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Array Stone images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 178.3 kB

  • Original 936.5 kB
  • After minification 936.5 kB
  • After compression 758.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 178.3 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 129.2 kB

  • Original 424.9 kB
  • After minification 424.9 kB
  • After compression 295.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Arraystone.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 129.2 kB or 30% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 91 (81%)

Requests Now

113

After Optimization

22

The browser has sent 113 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Array Stone. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 53 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 40 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

arraystone.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

arraystone.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

arraystone.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arraystone.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Arraystone.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Array Stone. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: