Tools & Wizards About Us
arrowfill.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

arrowfill.com

Arrowfill Pack Machinery | Auger Filler Machine | Packing Machine

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

815 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

139 ms

arrowfill.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to arrowfill.com homepage info - get ready to check Arrowfill best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about arrowfill.com

The Arrowfill Pack Machinery, India provide the latest packaging solution for the liquid, powder or the paste, We supply the optimum quantity machinery for packing.

Visit arrowfill.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Arrowfill.com page load time and found that the first response time was 815 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

arrowfill.com performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

73/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

arrowfill.com

815 ms

ga.js

7 ms

jquery.min.js

531 ms

coin-slider.js

513 ms

jqueryslidemenu.js

514 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Arrowfill.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Arrowfill.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 35.4 kB (2%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Arrowfill.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 19.2 kB

  • Original 23.2 kB
  • After minification 23.0 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Arrowfill images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 53.0 kB
  • After minification 53.0 kB
  • After compression 44.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 829 B

  • Original 2.6 kB
  • After minification 2.6 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Arrowfill.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 829 B or 32% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (9%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

31

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Arrowfill. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

arrowfill.com

arrowfill.com

815 ms

ga.js

ga.js

7 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

531 ms

coin-slider.js

coin-slider.js

513 ms

jqueryslidemenu.js

jqueryslidemenu.js

514 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

516 ms

coin-slider-styles.css

coin-slider-styles.css

517 ms

jqueryslidemenu.css

jqueryslidemenu.css

516 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

bg.png

bg.png

267 ms

logo.png

logo.png

513 ms

phone.png

phone.png

266 ms

home.png

home.png

266 ms

contact.png

contact.png

1556 ms

sitempa.png

sitempa.png

255 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

512 ms

fb.png

fb.png

529 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

528 ms

menubg.png

menubg.png

529 ms

menusepretor.png

menusepretor.png

763 ms

slider1.png

slider1.png

1524 ms

slider2.png

slider2.png

2278 ms

slider3.png

slider3.png

1557 ms

slider4.png

slider4.png

1795 ms

slider6.png

slider6.png

2252 ms

slider5.png

slider5.png

2028 ms

aboutthum.png

aboutthum.png

2316 ms

pro1.png

pro1.png

1821 ms

pro2.png

pro2.png

2055 ms

pro3.png

pro3.png

2087 ms

pro4.png

pro4.png

2283 ms

arrowl.png

arrowl.png

2277 ms

arrowr.png

arrowr.png

2315 ms

readblt.png

readblt.png

2492 ms

blt.png

blt.png

2498 ms

Accessibility Review

arrowfill.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

arrowfill.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

arrowfill.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arrowfill.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Arrowfill.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

arrowfill.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Arrowfill. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: