Tools & Wizards About Us
artevida.no screenshot

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 58

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 25% of websites

  • 85

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

artevida.no

Arte Vida AS

Page Load Speed

11.8 sec in total

First Response

2.1 sec

Resources Loaded

9.2 sec

Page Rendered

598 ms

artevida.no screenshot

About Website

Visit artevida.no now to see the best up-to-date Arte Vida content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about artevida.no

Dette er en eksempelside. Den er forskjellig fra et blogginnlegg fordi den blir på ett sted og vil vises i navigasjonsmenyen (i de fleste temaer). De fleste starter med en «Om meg»-side som introduser...

Visit artevida.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Artevida.no page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 9.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

artevida.no performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.artevida.no

2059 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

376 ms

style.css

973 ms

css

27 ms

styles.css

259 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Artevida.no, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Artevida.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 724.2 kB (44%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

924.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Artevida.no main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 726.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 26.2 kB

  • Original 33.7 kB
  • After minification 30.9 kB
  • After compression 7.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 24.0 kB

  • Original 726.5 kB
  • After minification 702.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Arte Vida images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 398.9 kB

  • Original 576.2 kB
  • After minification 539.7 kB
  • After compression 177.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 398.9 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 275.0 kB

  • Original 312.6 kB
  • After minification 241.4 kB
  • After compression 37.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Artevida.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 275.0 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (59%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Arte Vida. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.artevida.no

www.artevida.no

2059 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

376 ms

style.css

style.css

973 ms

css

css

27 ms

styles.css

styles.css

259 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

267 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

28 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

651 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

516 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

257 ms

flexslider.js

flexslider.js

430 ms

plugins_stack.js

plugins_stack.js

430 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

663 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

437 ms

jquery.infinitescroll.min.js

jquery.infinitescroll.min.js

620 ms

main.js

main.js

913 ms

portfolio-grid.js

portfolio-grid.js

610 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

631 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

675 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

854 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

873 ms

css

css

22 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

46 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

21 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

21 ms

logo1.png

logo1.png

924 ms

icons-s9d70e4ef52.png

icons-s9d70e4ef52.png

925 ms

wart.jpg

wart.jpg

1155 ms

aht.jpg

aht.jpg

1345 ms

dfg.jpg

dfg.jpg

1155 ms

Continental400.jpg

Continental400.jpg

1312 ms

trans.png

trans.png

926 ms

trans2.png

trans2.png

927 ms

F%C3%A6r%C3%B8yene6-350x270.jpg

F%C3%A6r%C3%B8yene6-350x270.jpg

3455 ms

F%C3%A6r%C3%B8yene7-613x540.jpg

F%C3%A6r%C3%B8yene7-613x540.jpg

3701 ms

F%C3%A6r%C3%B8yene.230x300-350x540.jpg

F%C3%A6r%C3%B8yene.230x300-350x540.jpg

4127 ms

oda.jpg

oda.jpg

1859 ms

varemesse.jpg

varemesse.jpg

1919 ms

slider_pattern.png

slider_pattern.png

1592 ms

css

css

24 ms

collect

collect

42 ms

bebasneue-webfont.svg

bebasneue-webfont.svg

1941 ms

bebasneue-webfont.woff

bebasneue-webfont.woff

2209 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

2330 ms

-g5pDUSRgvxvOl5u-a_WHw.woff

-g5pDUSRgvxvOl5u-a_WHw.woff

31 ms

oswald-regular-webfont.svg

oswald-regular-webfont.svg

2508 ms

oswald-regular-webfont.woff

oswald-regular-webfont.woff

2592 ms

gZ8EM_Gzaq4WRjCimioyzQ.woff

gZ8EM_Gzaq4WRjCimioyzQ.woff

2 ms

SHIcXhdd5RknatSgOzyEkA.woff

SHIcXhdd5RknatSgOzyEkA.woff

10 ms

Accessibility Review

artevida.no accessibility score

58

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

<object> elements do not have [alt] text

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

artevida.no best practices score

85

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

artevida.no SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    NB

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Artevida.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Artevida.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

artevida.no

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Arte Vida. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: