Tools & Wizards About Us
arthroneo.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

arthroneo.net

The domain name arthroneo.net is for sale

Page Load Speed

10.7 sec in total

First Response

2.3 sec

Resources Loaded

6.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.6 sec

arthroneo.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Arthroneo content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about arthroneo.net

The domain name arthroneo.net is for sale. Make an offer or buy it now at a set price.

Visit arthroneo.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Arthroneo.net page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 8.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

arthroneo.net performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.6 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,040 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.109

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.1 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

arthroneo.net

2327 ms

classic-themes.min.css

304 ms

styles.css

291 ms

rs6.css

326 ms

simple-banner.css

294 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Arthroneo.net, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Arthroneo.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 97.2 kB (3%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Arthroneo.net main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 81.7 kB

  • Original 107.5 kB
  • After minification 103.4 kB
  • After compression 25.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Arthroneo images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 996 B

  • Original 756.0 kB
  • After minification 756.0 kB
  • After compression 755.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 52.1 kB
  • After minification 51.9 kB
  • After compression 48.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Arthroneo.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (60%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Arthroneo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

arthroneo.net

arthroneo.net

2327 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

304 ms

styles.css

styles.css

291 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

326 ms

simple-banner.css

simple-banner.css

294 ms

ninjaforms.css

ninjaforms.css

335 ms

flatsome.css

flatsome.css

219 ms

flatsome-shop.css

flatsome-shop.css

236 ms

style.css

style.css

245 ms

css

css

51 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

263 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

275 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

293 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

781 ms

simple-banner.js

simple-banner.js

583 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

209 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

655 ms

css

css

20 ms

index.js

index.js

130 ms

index.js

index.js

414 ms

flatsome-live-search.js

flatsome-live-search.js

169 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

408 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

169 ms

hoverIntent.min.js

hoverIntent.min.js

171 ms

flatsome.js

flatsome.js

178 ms

woocommerce.js

woocommerce.js

191 ms

zxcvbn-async.min.js

zxcvbn-async.min.js

210 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

223 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

257 ms

password-strength-meter.min.js

password-strength-meter.min.js

270 ms

password-strength-meter.min.js

password-strength-meter.min.js

289 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

69 ms

arthoneo.png

arthoneo.png

59 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

301 ms

tick.png

tick.png

283 ms

arthoneo-ingredients.png

arthoneo-ingredients.png

718 ms

33.png

33.png

751 ms

22.png

22.png

531 ms

11.png

11.png

570 ms

arthro_befaft.jpg

arthro_befaft.jpg

721 ms

11898538_10207208663676674_8264165262394193805_n-400x400.jpg

11898538_10207208663676674_8264165262394193805_n-400x400.jpg

654 ms

46495054_110510959970609_1038619651627548672_n-400x400.jpg

46495054_110510959970609_1038619651627548672_n-400x400.jpg

894 ms

67771684_10219088495193938_3338576451111747584_n-400x400.jpg

67771684_10219088495193938_3338576451111747584_n-400x400.jpg

936 ms

Arthroneo11-800x800.jpg

Arthroneo11-800x800.jpg

1110 ms

Arthroneo-22-800x800.jpg

Arthroneo-22-800x800.jpg

1192 ms

Arthroneo-33-800x800.jpg

Arthroneo-33-800x800.jpg

1193 ms

Arthroneo-44-800x800.jpg

Arthroneo-44-800x800.jpg

1201 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

207 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

253 ms

ec.js

ec.js

65 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

169 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

159 ms

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf

169 ms

fl-icons.ttf

fl-icons.ttf

1067 ms

collect

collect

42 ms

collect

collect

36 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

718 ms

arthroNeo-slider.jpg

arthroNeo-slider.jpg

730 ms

js

js

158 ms

zxcvbn.min.js

zxcvbn.min.js

60 ms

Accessibility Review

arthroneo.net accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

arthroneo.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

arthroneo.net SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Arthroneo.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Arthroneo.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

arthroneo.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Arthroneo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: