Tools & Wizards About Us
artim.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

artim.org

Art Logistics | Artim

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

90 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

53 ms

artim.org screenshot

About Website

Visit artim.org now to see the best up-to-date Artim content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about artim.org

Founded in 2001, ARTIM brings together the premier fine art logistic companies from around the world. ARTIM participants serve the world’s leading museums, galleries, auction houses, dealers, and priv...

Visit artim.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Artim.org page load time and found that the first response time was 90 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

artim.org performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

54/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.8 s

44/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.artim.org

90 ms

minified.js

32 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

29 ms

polyfill.min.js

823 ms

thunderbolt-commons.adaa8d77.bundle.min.js

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Artim.org, 34% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 31% (11 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (823 ms) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 501.0 kB (54%)

Content Size

923.3 kB

After Optimization

422.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Artim.org main page is 923.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 601.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 481.3 kB

  • Original 601.4 kB
  • After minification 599.8 kB
  • After compression 120.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 481.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 16.1 kB

  • Original 62.9 kB
  • After minification 46.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Artim needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.1 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 259.0 kB
  • After minification 259.0 kB
  • After compression 255.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (43%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Artim. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.artim.org

www.artim.org

90 ms

minified.js

minified.js

32 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

29 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

823 ms

thunderbolt-commons.adaa8d77.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.adaa8d77.bundle.min.js

17 ms

main.213217e1.bundle.min.js

main.213217e1.bundle.min.js

48 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

16 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

47 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

17 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

47 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

48 ms

nsplsh_35544b314635566664496b~mv2.jpg

nsplsh_35544b314635566664496b~mv2.jpg

210 ms

nsplsh_34c372978a5645b198efc10ad6d77c31~mv2.jpg

nsplsh_34c372978a5645b198efc10ad6d77c31~mv2.jpg

398 ms

nsplsh_4845457659684e7a70456f~mv2.jpg

nsplsh_4845457659684e7a70456f~mv2.jpg

380 ms

nsplsh_44423775396b5a6e7a6767~mv2_d_2454_3761_s_4_2.jpg

nsplsh_44423775396b5a6e7a6767~mv2_d_2454_3761_s_4_2.jpg

426 ms

55fd84_46a81f0977e843f5a15ea05b17613732~mv2.jpeg

55fd84_46a81f0977e843f5a15ea05b17613732~mv2.jpeg

349 ms

ARTIMLOGO_HOTEL.jpg

ARTIMLOGO_HOTEL.jpg

395 ms

image011_edited.png

image011_edited.png

401 ms

ARTIMLOGO_MARRAKECH.png

ARTIMLOGO_MARRAKECH.png

480 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

41 ms

95 ms

99 ms

96 ms

96 ms

93 ms

93 ms

134 ms

141 ms

137 ms

137 ms

136 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

5 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

21 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

5 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

5 ms

Accessibility Review

artim.org accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

artim.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

artim.org SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Artim.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Artim.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

artim.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Artim. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: