Tools & Wizards About Us
artisancrew.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

artisancrew.com

Los Angeles custom software development, web design and website development, SEM (Search Engine Marketing) SEO (Search Engine Optimization) and intern...

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

90 ms

Resources Loaded

987 ms

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

artisancrew.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Artisan Crew content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about artisancrew.com

Web Marketing, Web design, Custom Software development, Branding and International Advertising Support for Los Angeles, Torrance, and the world.

Visit artisancrew.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Artisancrew.com page load time and found that the first response time was 90 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

artisancrew.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value670 ms

44/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.363

30/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

artisancrew.com

90 ms

www.artisancrew.com

152 ms

gtm.js

70 ms

css

35 ms

font-awesome.css

90 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Artisancrew.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (402 ms) belongs to the original domain Artisancrew.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 68.6 kB (5%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Artisancrew.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 62.0 kB

  • Original 79.1 kB
  • After minification 62.0 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.1 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Artisan Crew images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 6.7 kB
  • After minification 6.7 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 23% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 12.7 kB
  • After minification 12.7 kB
  • After compression 9.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Artisancrew.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.2 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (19%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Artisan Crew. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

artisancrew.com

artisancrew.com

90 ms

www.artisancrew.com

www.artisancrew.com

152 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

70 ms

css

css

35 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

90 ms

1st_css

1st_css

116 ms

settings.min.css

settings.min.css

153 ms

logo.png

logo.png

133 ms

english.png

english.png

132 ms

japanese.png

japanese.png

131 ms

ace-top-3.jpg

ace-top-3.jpg

206 ms

ace-top.jpg

ace-top.jpg

161 ms

ace-top-1.jpg

ace-top-1.jpg

183 ms

ace-top-2.jpg

ace-top-2.jpg

206 ms

home-concept-item-ace1r.png

home-concept-item-ace1r.png

145 ms

home-concept-item-ace1y.png

home-concept-item-ace1y.png

170 ms

home-concept-item-ace1b.png

home-concept-item-ace1b.png

169 ms

artisan-crew-total.png

artisan-crew-total.png

195 ms

artisan-crew-a.png

artisan-crew-a.png

203 ms

artisan-crew-c.png

artisan-crew-c.png

203 ms

artisan-crew-e.png

artisan-crew-e.png

206 ms

ace-branding-j.jpg

ace-branding-j.jpg

219 ms

ace-ecom-j.jpg

ace-ecom-j.jpg

402 ms

mobile-sys-res-1.png

mobile-sys-res-1.png

392 ms

mobile-sys-res-2.png

mobile-sys-res-2.png

391 ms

embed

embed

396 ms

2nd_css

2nd_css

218 ms

Js

Js

396 ms

logo-footer.png

logo-footer.png

390 ms

social-sprites.png

social-sprites.png

160 ms

bg1.jpg

bg1.jpg

158 ms

1st_css

1st_css

159 ms

web-design-ace-8.jpg

web-design-ace-8.jpg

160 ms

custom-header-bg4.jpg

custom-header-bg4.jpg

160 ms

sem-top-j.jpg

sem-top-j.jpg

361 ms

pattern.png

pattern.png

162 ms

lt-black.jpg

lt-black.jpg

162 ms

ace.jpg

ace.jpg

359 ms

lter-black.jpg

lter-black.jpg

359 ms

ace-prlx-3.jpg

ace-prlx-3.jpg

361 ms

btm-bkg.jpg

btm-bkg.jpg

360 ms

js

js

259 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

114 ms

timer.png

timer.png

111 ms

bullet.png

bullet.png

113 ms

large_left.png

large_left.png

113 ms

large_right.png

large_right.png

113 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

32 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

57 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

108 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

109 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

117 ms

UqyNK9UOIntux_czAvDQx_ZcHqZXBNQzdcD8.ttf

UqyNK9UOIntux_czAvDQx_ZcHqZXBNQzdcD8.ttf

116 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

105 ms

search.js

search.js

53 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

53 ms

Accessibility Review

artisancrew.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

artisancrew.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

artisancrew.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Artisancrew.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Artisancrew.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

artisancrew.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Artisan Crew. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: