2.4 sec in total
510 ms
1.5 sec
369 ms
Welcome to ascenttechnology.in homepage info - get ready to check Ascent Technology best content right away, or after learning these important things about ascenttechnology.in
Visit ascenttechnology.inWe analyzed Ascenttechnology.in page load time and found that the first response time was 510 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
ascenttechnology.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value1,230 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.087
93/100
15%
Value18.3 s
3/100
10%
510 ms
190 ms
171 ms
232 ms
320 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Ascenttechnology.in, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (510 ms) belongs to the original domain Ascenttechnology.in.
Page size can be reduced by 200.6 kB (28%)
707.9 kB
507.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Ascenttechnology.in main page is 707.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 467.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.9 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ascent Technology images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 74.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 74.3 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 104.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ascenttechnology.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 104.9 kB or 91% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (51%)
49
24
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ascent Technology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ascenttechnology.in
510 ms
Ascent.css
190 ms
slider.css
171 ms
thumbnail-slider.js
232 ms
style.css
320 ms
gestures.js
178 ms
jquery.css
97 ms
jquery.js
235 ms
jquery_002.js
242 ms
css
24 ms
header_bg.jpg
68 ms
logo.jpg
75 ms
phone_icon.jpg
86 ms
mail_icon.jpg
89 ms
hover_up.jpg
77 ms
1gjn2nc.jpg
221 ms
1gjnulm_002.jpg
143 ms
1m0nxnr.jpg
224 ms
1gjnulm.jpg
279 ms
1gjn2nc_002.jpg
238 ms
1m0nxnr_002.jpg
202 ms
icon.jpg
218 ms
servic_head_bg.jpg
250 ms
list_errow.jpg
280 ms
thumb01.jpg
294 ms
thumb02.jpg
308 ms
thumb03.jpg
321 ms
about_ng.jpg
304 ms
img.jpg
343 ms
left_line.jpg
351 ms
testi.jpg
352 ms
main.jpg
367 ms
text_heading_bg.png
377 ms
client_logo.jpg
389 ms
client_logo01.jpg
399 ms
client_logo2.jpg
433 ms
client_logo3.jpg
421 ms
client_logo4.jpg
439 ms
client_logo5.jpg
451 ms
footer_bg.jpg
458 ms
under_line.jpg
444 ms
lo_icon.jpg
467 ms
tel_icon.jpg
475 ms
mail.jpg
503 ms
facebook_icon.jpg
502 ms
twitter_icon.jpg
504 ms
swisscb-webfont.woff
453 ms
myriadpro-boldcond_0.woff
453 ms
icon01.jpg
451 ms
rss_icon.jpg
495 ms
google_icon.jpg
493 ms
loader.gif
439 ms
ad_scroll_back.png
378 ms
ad_scroll_forward.png
364 ms
swisscb-webfont.ttf
66 ms
myriadpro-boldcond_0.ttf
132 ms
view_bttn_hover.png
44 ms
ascenttechnology.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ascenttechnology.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ascenttechnology.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ascenttechnology.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ascenttechnology.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ascenttechnology.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ascent Technology. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: