Tools & Wizards About Us
aselector.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

aselector.com

AI Complaints Management, Agent scripts, Chatbot and customer self service Guides

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

687 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

280 ms

aselector.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to aselector.com homepage info - get ready to check Aselector best content right away, or after learning these important things about aselector.com

Improve your business with the best Knowledge Management platform for agents and customers. No-code, free, easy to create agent scripting guide, lead generation chatbot and easy customer self service ...

Visit aselector.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Aselector.com page load time and found that the first response time was 687 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

aselector.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

10/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.6 s

47/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

aselector.com

687 ms

aselector.com

1305 ms

js

65 ms

bootstrap.min.css

30 ms

w3.css

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Aselector.com, 19% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net and 6% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Aselector.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 25.9 kB (62%)

Content Size

41.7 kB

After Optimization

15.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Aselector.com main page is 41.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 28.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 21.8 kB

  • Original 28.7 kB
  • After minification 24.5 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.2 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 452 B

  • Original 3.1 kB
  • After minification 2.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Aselector needs image optimization as it can save up to 452 B or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 748 B

  • Original 1.0 kB
  • After minification 835 B
  • After compression 271 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 748 B or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 8.8 kB
  • After minification 7.1 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aselector.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (31%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aselector. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

aselector.com

aselector.com

687 ms

aselector.com

aselector.com

1305 ms

js

js

65 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

30 ms

w3.css

w3.css

22 ms

bootstrap-icons.css

bootstrap-icons.css

38 ms

Aselwebsite.css

Aselwebsite.css

427 ms

Aselector_Logo.png

Aselector_Logo.png

642 ms

AselectorChat.css

AselectorChat.css

648 ms

Aselectorchat.js

Aselectorchat.js

664 ms

HomeImage.svg

HomeImage.svg

445 ms

Landscape.svg

Landscape.svg

644 ms

chatStart.svg

chatStart.svg

643 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

24 ms

bootstrap-icons.woff

bootstrap-icons.woff

13 ms

insight_tag_errors.gif

insight_tag_errors.gif

102 ms

Accessibility Review

aselector.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

aselector.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

aselector.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aselector.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Aselector.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

aselector.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Aselector. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: