Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

asfpm.org

The Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc. | ASFPM

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

12 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

359 ms

asfpm.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to asfpm.org homepage info - get ready to check ASFPM best content right away, or after learning these important things about asfpm.org

Organization of professionals in floodplain management, flood hazard mitigation, National Flood Insurance Program, and flood preparedness, warning and recovery.

Visit asfpm.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Asfpm.org page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

asfpm.org performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value720 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.11

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

asfpm.org

12 ms

www.floods.org

265 ms

all.min.css

46 ms

formidableforms.css

51 ms

style-blocks-rowlayout.css

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 151 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Asfpm.org, 48% (73 requests) were made to Floods.org and 48% (72 requests) were made to Eadn-wc02-4568911.nxedge.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Floods.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 843.2 kB (63%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

499.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Asfpm.org main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 843.1 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 220.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 843.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 65 B

  • Original 279.1 kB
  • After minification 279.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ASFPM images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (77%)

Requests Now

77

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ASFPM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 37 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

asfpm.org accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

asfpm.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

asfpm.org SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Asfpm.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Asfpm.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ASFPM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: