Tools & Wizards About Us
aspen.review screenshot

Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

aspen.review

Aspen Review – Ideas Impacting Society

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

27 ms

Resources Loaded

683 ms

Page Rendered

358 ms

aspen.review screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Aspen content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about aspen.review

A non-partisan platform dedicated to policy innovation, fostering inclusive dialogue, and facilitating the exchange of ideas.

Visit aspen.review

Key Findings

We analyzed Aspen.review page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

aspen.review performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

72/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.2 s

74/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

aspen.review

27 ms

aspen.review

194 ms

all.min.css

37 ms

simple-line-icons.min.css

35 ms

style.min.css

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Aspen.review, 20% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (273 ms) belongs to the original domain Aspen.review.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 262.9 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Aspen.review main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 44.9 kB

  • Original 57.3 kB
  • After minification 55.2 kB
  • After compression 12.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 217.7 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 858.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Aspen needs image optimization as it can save up to 217.7 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 87 B

  • Original 121.1 kB
  • After minification 121.1 kB
  • After compression 121.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 293 B

  • Original 76.4 kB
  • After minification 76.4 kB
  • After compression 76.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aspen.review has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (83%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aspen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

aspen.review

aspen.review

27 ms

aspen.review

aspen.review

194 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

37 ms

simple-line-icons.min.css

simple-line-icons.min.css

35 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

27 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

52 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

40 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

41 ms

post-12.css

post-12.css

42 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

42 ms

post-14.css

post-14.css

46 ms

widgets.css

widgets.css

43 ms

css

css

41 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

59 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

57 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

48 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

58 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

98 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

95 ms

theme.min.js

theme.min.js

101 ms

drop-down-mobile-menu.min.js

drop-down-mobile-menu.min.js

100 ms

drop-down-search.min.js

drop-down-search.min.js

103 ms

magnific-popup.min.js

magnific-popup.min.js

105 ms

ow-lightbox.min.js

ow-lightbox.min.js

107 ms

flickity.pkgd.min.js

flickity.pkgd.min.js

109 ms

ow-slider.min.js

ow-slider.min.js

109 ms

scroll-effect.min.js

scroll-effect.min.js

117 ms

scroll-top.min.js

scroll-top.min.js

116 ms

select.min.js

select.min.js

115 ms

flickr.min.js

flickr.min.js

116 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

115 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

121 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

121 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

123 ms

woman-with-clipboard-near-male-colleagues-scaled.jpg

woman-with-clipboard-near-male-colleagues-scaled.jpg

38 ms

people-browsing-laptops-office-1024x683.jpg

people-browsing-laptops-office-1024x683.jpg

34 ms

people-with-laptops-office-1024x683.jpg

people-with-laptops-office-1024x683.jpg

38 ms

pattern-1.png

pattern-1.png

47 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

38 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf

46 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

53 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

57 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

57 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf

63 ms

Simple-Line-Icons.ttf

Simple-Line-Icons.ttf

273 ms

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52xwNZWMf_.ttf

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52xwNZWMf_.ttf

5 ms

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52_wFZWMf_.ttf

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52_wFZWMf_.ttf

5 ms

u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZJ.ttf

u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZJ.ttf

5 ms

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l521wRZWMf_.ttf

u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l521wRZWMf_.ttf

5 ms

Accessibility Review

aspen.review accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

aspen.review best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

aspen.review SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aspen.review can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Aspen.review main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

aspen.review

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Aspen. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: