Tools & Wizards About Us
aspenparkframing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

aspenparkframing.com

Art & Framing - Conifer, CO - Aspen Park Art & Framing

Page Load Speed

896 ms in total

First Response

54 ms

Resources Loaded

446 ms

Page Rendered

396 ms

aspenparkframing.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Aspen Park Framing content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about aspenparkframing.com

Aspen Park Art & Framing provides custom picture framing in Conifer, Colorado. Call us at (303) 838-9851 or come visit our store today!

Visit aspenparkframing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Aspenparkframing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 54 ms and then it took 842 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

aspenparkframing.com performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

64/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.8 s

45/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

aspenparkframing.com

54 ms

www.aspenparkframing.com

120 ms

42428de-1920w.jpg

208 ms

visa.png

58 ms

jquery.min.js

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Aspenparkframing.com, 52% (12 requests) were made to Lirp.cdn-website.com and 17% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.website.thryv.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (269 ms) relates to the external source Lirp.cdn-website.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 93.2 kB (29%)

Content Size

318.4 kB

After Optimization

225.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Aspenparkframing.com main page is 318.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 143.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 72.5 kB

  • Original 120.6 kB
  • After minification 117.0 kB
  • After compression 48.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.5 kB or 60% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 20.7 kB

  • Original 54.1 kB
  • After minification 33.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Aspen Park Framing needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.7 kB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 87 B

  • Original 143.8 kB
  • After minification 143.8 kB
  • After compression 143.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (48%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aspen Park Framing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

aspenparkframing.com

aspenparkframing.com

54 ms

www.aspenparkframing.com

www.aspenparkframing.com

120 ms

42428de-1920w.jpg

42428de-1920w.jpg

208 ms

visa.png

visa.png

58 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

54 ms

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

d-js-one-runtime-unified-desktop.min.js

65 ms

popup.js

popup.js

28 ms

js

js

81 ms

dxmscript.min.js

dxmscript.min.js

255 ms

mastercard.png

mastercard.png

50 ms

cash.png

cash.png

51 ms

check.png

check.png

62 ms

056-38w.png

056-38w.png

160 ms

050-38w.png

050-38w.png

135 ms

554-236h.png

554-236h.png

117 ms

58828de-1920w.png

58828de-1920w.png

177 ms

436-1920w.jpg

436-1920w.jpg

140 ms

954-600h.jpg

954-600h.jpg

257 ms

058-1920w.png

058-1920w.png

224 ms

056-1920w.png

056-1920w.png

257 ms

050-1920w.png

050-1920w.png

162 ms

058-38w.png

058-38w.png

257 ms

511-24w.png

511-24w.png

269 ms

Accessibility Review

aspenparkframing.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

aspenparkframing.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

aspenparkframing.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aspenparkframing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Aspenparkframing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

aspenparkframing.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Aspen Park Framing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: