Tools & Wizards About Us
aspnetcenter.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 37

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

aspnetcenter.com

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

776 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

2 sec

aspnetcenter.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to aspnetcenter.com homepage info - get ready to check Aspnetcenter best content right away, or after learning these important things about aspnetcenter.com

Visit aspnetcenter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Aspnetcenter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 776 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

aspnetcenter.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value83.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value151.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value168.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.228

55/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value152.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

aspnetcenter.com

776 ms

style.css

137 ms

addtoany.min.css

86 ms

jquery.js

198 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

117 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Aspnetcenter.com, 23% (13 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Passandplay-a.akamaihd.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Body-bg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 947.5 kB (62%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

586.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Aspnetcenter.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 518.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 241.9 kB

  • Original 280.2 kB
  • After minification 233.5 kB
  • After compression 38.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 46.7 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 241.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 43.2 kB

  • Original 321.5 kB
  • After minification 278.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Aspnetcenter needs image optimization as it can save up to 43.2 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 262.8 kB

  • Original 413.7 kB
  • After minification 410.0 kB
  • After compression 151.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 262.8 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 399.5 kB

  • Original 518.4 kB
  • After minification 511.1 kB
  • After compression 118.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aspnetcenter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 399.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (47%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aspnetcenter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

aspnetcenter.com

aspnetcenter.com

776 ms

style.css

style.css

137 ms

addtoany.min.css

addtoany.min.css

86 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

198 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

117 ms

script.js

script.js

154 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

224 ms

cr

cr

99 ms

accountant_approach.gif

accountant_approach.gif

1355 ms

page.js

page.js

37 ms

d6x2j4xwcgcxcv7zg.jpg

d6x2j4xwcgcxcv7zg.jpg

635 ms

page_t.jpg

page_t.jpg

696 ms

sheet_s.png

sheet_s.png

651 ms

sheet_h.png

sheet_h.png

651 ms

sheet_v.png

sheet_v.png

649 ms

header.png

header.png

702 ms

header.jpg

header.jpg

661 ms

Logo.png

Logo.png

925 ms

nav.png

nav.png

727 ms

menuitem.png

menuitem.png

727 ms

postheadericon.png

postheadericon.png

766 ms

postdateicon.png

postdateicon.png

766 ms

postauthoricon.png

postauthoricon.png

921 ms

postcategoryicon.png

postcategoryicon.png

869 ms

posttagicon.png

posttagicon.png

868 ms

postcommentsicon.png

postcommentsicon.png

868 ms

5k0qz5eukbx1iwuzg.jpg

5k0qz5eukbx1iwuzg.jpg

626 ms

sVttm7dMpbc

sVttm7dMpbc

580 ms

2sSpdRtuyFA

2sSpdRtuyFA

641 ms

sPej0aZfafA

sPej0aZfafA

662 ms

IEXXhVNgigw

IEXXhVNgigw

648 ms

VN5cBTL41GE

VN5cBTL41GE

643 ms

Z3bsYpOI3Us

Z3bsYpOI3Us

631 ms

bKNfS9W4lUc

bKNfS9W4lUc

628 ms

vhOYQAHwuN0

vhOYQAHwuN0

700 ms

sb7tpJsaIrc

sb7tpJsaIrc

748 ms

KdWp90Cpk24

KdWp90Cpk24

683 ms

fQI2IoBT1CE

fQI2IoBT1CE

708 ms

J-fKUskX9bU

J-fKUskX9bU

623 ms

5jN9ZQGRuOI

5jN9ZQGRuOI

714 ms

button.png

button.png

1184 ms

blockheader.png

blockheader.png

777 ms

blockcontentbullets.png

blockcontentbullets.png

779 ms

footer_t.png

footer_t.png

777 ms

footer_s.png

footer_s.png

777 ms

footer_b.png

footer_b.png

779 ms

rssicon.png

rssicon.png

1182 ms

sm13.html

sm13.html

508 ms

icons.15.svg.css

icons.15.svg.css

137 ms

cf

cf

22 ms

www-embed-player-vflRGs1ko.css

www-embed-player-vflRGs1ko.css

156 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

225 ms

base.js

base.js

300 ms

cfb

cfb

31 ms

down.mediafire.com

down.mediafire.com

59 ms

ga.js

ga.js

195 ms

Accessibility Review

aspnetcenter.com accessibility score

37

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

aspnetcenter.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aspnetcenter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Aspnetcenter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

aspnetcenter.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Aspnetcenter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: