Tools & Wizards About Us
assessment.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

assessment.com

Assessment.com - Home of the MAPP Assessment - Assessment.com

Page Load Speed

38.3 sec in total

First Response

540 ms

Resources Loaded

12.4 sec

Page Rendered

25.3 sec

assessment.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Assessment content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about assessment.com

Looking for a new career or job? Take the online MAPP test and find out what truly motivates you!

Visit assessment.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Assessment.com page load time and found that the first response time was 540 ms and then it took 37.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

assessment.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value270 ms

82/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.148

76/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.0 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

assessment.com

540 ms

bootstrap.css

1268 ms

font-awesome.min.css

1314 ms

animate.css

1158 ms

site.css

1370 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Assessment.com, 17% (6 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 14% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (47%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Assessment.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 16.5 kB

  • Original 21.1 kB
  • After minification 16.0 kB
  • After compression 4.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.1 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 46.7 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Assessment images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 412.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 553.9 kB

  • Original 677.3 kB
  • After minification 604.4 kB
  • After compression 123.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Assessment.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 553.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (48%)

Requests Now

27

After Optimization

14

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Assessment. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

assessment.com

assessment.com

540 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

1268 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1314 ms

animate.css

animate.css

1158 ms

site.css

site.css

1370 ms

modernizr-2.6.2.js

modernizr-2.6.2.js

1500 ms

modernizr-2.8.3.js

modernizr-2.8.3.js

1500 ms

css

css

81 ms

jquery-1.10.2.js

jquery-1.10.2.js

3150 ms

jquery-2.1.0.js

jquery-2.1.0.js

2865 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

2864 ms

blocs.min.js

blocs.min.js

2864 ms

respond.js

respond.js

3150 ms

MappLogo_01.png

MappLogo_01.png

352 ms

HateJob_02.jpg

HateJob_02.jpg

353 ms

Unemployed_03.jpg

Unemployed_03.jpg

3196 ms

Box1_MappAssessment_01.jpg

Box1_MappAssessment_01.jpg

3054 ms

ResultsGirl_03.jpg

ResultsGirl_03.jpg

3053 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

3464 ms

A1-Poster-Assessment-02.jpg

A1-Poster-Assessment-02.jpg

3257 ms

texture-pixel.gif

texture-pixel.gif

3258 ms

5pEc4QKTMA2oB4Hi9NkS4w.ttf

5pEc4QKTMA2oB4Hi9NkS4w.ttf

349 ms

zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf

zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf

410 ms

4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf

4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf

409 ms

BTu4SsVveqk58cdYjlaM9g.ttf

BTu4SsVveqk58cdYjlaM9g.ttf

410 ms

vDvcuXwZxUMLuTfuLrSLpA.ttf

vDvcuXwZxUMLuTfuLrSLpA.ttf

410 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

325 ms

ga.js

ga.js

50 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

18 ms

pageload-spinner.gif

pageload-spinner.gif

2293 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

1585 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

173 ms

collect

collect

141 ms

collect

collect

70 ms

collect

collect

261 ms

collect

collect

228 ms

Accessibility Review

assessment.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

assessment.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

assessment.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Assessment.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Assessment.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

assessment.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Assessment. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: