Tools & Wizards About Us
assetprotectionlawjournal.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

assetprotectionlawjournal.com

Asset Protection Law Journal | Schneider Smeltz Spieth Bell LLP

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

50 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

425 ms

assetprotectionlawjournal.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Asset Protection Law Journal content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about assetprotectionlawjournal.com

Focused on asset protection planning and related areas –business and real estate law, trusts, estate planning and business succession planning.

Visit assetprotectionlawjournal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Assetprotectionlawjournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

assetprotectionlawjournal.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

81/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,500 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.158

74/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

assetprotectionlawjournal.com

50 ms

assetprotectionlawjournal.com

32 ms

www.assetprotectionlawjournal.com

224 ms

style.min.css

37 ms

styles.css

29 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Assetprotectionlawjournal.com, 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (487 ms) belongs to the original domain Assetprotectionlawjournal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 111.9 kB (18%)

Content Size

612.5 kB

After Optimization

500.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Assetprotectionlawjournal.com main page is 612.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 289.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 100.2 kB

  • Original 119.4 kB
  • After minification 119.4 kB
  • After compression 19.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 100.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 10.5 kB

  • Original 137.2 kB
  • After minification 126.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Asset Protection Law Journal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 289.2 kB
  • After minification 289.2 kB
  • After compression 288.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 66.7 kB
  • After minification 66.7 kB
  • After compression 66.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Assetprotectionlawjournal.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (77%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Asset Protection Law Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

assetprotectionlawjournal.com

assetprotectionlawjournal.com

50 ms

assetprotectionlawjournal.com

assetprotectionlawjournal.com

32 ms

www.assetprotectionlawjournal.com

www.assetprotectionlawjournal.com

224 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

37 ms

styles.css

styles.css

29 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

42 ms

front.css

front.css

46 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

67 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

81 ms

script.js

script.js

84 ms

js

js

221 ms

config.js

config.js

205 ms

style.css

style.css

52 ms

index.js

index.js

186 ms

index.js

index.js

186 ms

api.js

api.js

348 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

188 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

186 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

186 ms

index.js

index.js

187 ms

script.js

script.js

219 ms

logo-horizontal-550x141.png

logo-horizontal-550x141.png

344 ms

mast-bg.jpg

mast-bg.jpg

49 ms

logo-stacked-600x275.png

logo-stacked-600x275.png

343 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

181 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

210 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

487 ms

Accessibility Review

assetprotectionlawjournal.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

assetprotectionlawjournal.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

assetprotectionlawjournal.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Assetprotectionlawjournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Assetprotectionlawjournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

assetprotectionlawjournal.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Asset Protection Law Journal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: