4.9 sec in total
401 ms
4.1 sec
388 ms
Click here to check amazing Astrograph content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about astrograph.net
A range of equipment and tutorials for helping you enjoy Astrophotography using a Digital cameras. All our products are optimised for Imaging
Visit astrograph.netWe analyzed Astrograph.net page load time and found that the first response time was 401 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
astrograph.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
74/100
10%
Value2.3 s
93/100
25%
Value3.4 s
89/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.703
7/100
15%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
401 ms
161 ms
372 ms
759 ms
406 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Astrograph.net, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Secure-eshop.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Astrograph.net.
Page size can be reduced by 538.0 kB (24%)
2.3 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Astrograph.net main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Astrograph images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 301.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 301.2 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 204.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Astrograph.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 204.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (71%)
65
19
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Astrograph. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
astrograph.net
401 ms
161 ms
package-sf.css
372 ms
package-sf.js
759 ms
StorefrontStyle_161.css
406 ms
style-ie.css
129 ms
en-GB.js
148 ms
GBP.js
148 ms
string.js
146 ms
browser.js
246 ms
scope.js
246 ms
json.js
256 ms
base64.js
257 ms
inject-sec-token.js
263 ms
cookie.js
262 ms
button.js
364 ms
draggable.js
363 ms
resizable.js
364 ms
$pub.js
372 ms
class.js
377 ms
mime.js
380 ms
$dict.js
484 ms
core.js
483 ms
support.js
481 ms
$tmpl.js
491 ms
load.js
499 ms
touch.js
507 ms
version.js
603 ms
validate.js
602 ms
storage.js
609 ms
de_epages.js
605 ms
ga.js
21 ms
Spiral.jpg
1527 ms
logo.png
531 ms
bgr_header.gif
612 ms
bgr_top.gif
610 ms
bgr_top_button_active.png
614 ms
bgr_top_button_floatin_active.png
616 ms
bgr_top_button.png
651 ms
bgr_top_button_floatin.png
732 ms
bgr_right.png
734 ms
bgr_right_boxbody_floatin.png
740 ms
bgr_right_boxbody.png
737 ms
bgr_right_boxhead.png
778 ms
bgr_right_boxhead_floatin.png
851 ms
ico_s_search.png
854 ms
gadget_contentslider.png
537 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
suggest.js
757 ms
$ready.js
753 ms
energylabel.js
797 ms
utf8.js
862 ms
img_actionlink.png
860 ms
bgr_content.png
863 ms
bgr_bottom_floatin.png
755 ms
bgr_bottom.png
809 ms
bgr_bottom_button.png
861 ms
bgr_bottom_button_floatin.png
860 ms
dict.en.json
748 ms
dictionary.en.json
275 ms
contentslider.js
299 ms
cycle.js
127 ms
APM_Binoculars_v3.png
737 ms
Point_Grey_31.png
864 ms
Moravian_23.png
862 ms
a.js
515 ms
astrograph.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
astrograph.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
astrograph.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Astrograph.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Astrograph.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
astrograph.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Astrograph. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: