Tools & Wizards About Us
astrographic.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

astrographic.com

Astrographic Industries Surrey | Print | Signage | Traffic | Wayfinding

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

811 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

860 ms

astrographic.com screenshot

About Website

Visit astrographic.com now to see the best up-to-date Astrographic content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about astrographic.com

Astrographic Ind. is working with a multitude of customers ranging from large government sectors to small local businesses. We are leading provider of custom signage for your home & business. Create y...

Visit astrographic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Astrographic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 811 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

astrographic.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.8 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.astrographic.com

811 ms

js

72 ms

embed.css

44 ms

style.min.css

23 ms

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Astrographic.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Assets.juicer.io and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (811 ms) belongs to the original domain Astrographic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 218.3 kB (4%)

Content Size

6.0 MB

After Optimization

5.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Astrographic.com main page is 6.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 56.7 kB

  • Original 70.7 kB
  • After minification 67.8 kB
  • After compression 14.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 61.5 kB

  • Original 5.4 MB
  • After minification 5.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Astrographic images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 99.2 kB

  • Original 447.5 kB
  • After minification 443.0 kB
  • After compression 348.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 99.2 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 125.2 kB
  • After minification 125.2 kB
  • After compression 124.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Astrographic.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (75%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Astrographic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.astrographic.com

www.astrographic.com

811 ms

js

js

72 ms

embed.css

embed.css

44 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

23 ms

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

40 ms

wc-blocks-style.css

wc-blocks-style.css

84 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

91 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

93 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

67 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

65 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

68 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

96 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

97 ms

style.c68f1b70.css

style.c68f1b70.css

100 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

110 ms

embed-no-jquery.js

embed-no-jquery.js

62 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

108 ms

219847.js

219847.js

39 ms

classic-10_7.css

classic-10_7.css

33 ms

mc-validate.js

mc-validate.js

62 ms

wpdevart_lightbox_front.css

wpdevart_lightbox_front.css

107 ms

effects_lightbox.css

effects_lightbox.css

108 ms

index.js

index.js

108 ms

index.js

index.js

249 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

262 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

262 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

263 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

264 ms

cart-fragments.min.js

cart-fragments.min.js

264 ms

select2.full.min.js

select2.full.min.js

265 ms

svgxuse.min.js

svgxuse.min.js

271 ms

velocity.min.js

velocity.min.js

271 ms

am2-functions.min.6c0648d7.js

am2-functions.min.6c0648d7.js

274 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

280 ms

wpdevart_lightbox_front.js

wpdevart_lightbox_front.js

284 ms

embed.js

embed.js

31 ms

hotjar-2039784.js

hotjar-2039784.js

274 ms

sprite.svg

sprite.svg

107 ms

hero-image.jpg

hero-image.jpg

145 ms

site-bg.png

site-bg.png

168 ms

5P9A0814-scaled.jpg

5P9A0814-scaled.jpg

187 ms

5P9A0735-e1521500822553.jpg

5P9A0735-e1521500822553.jpg

134 ms

lees-market.jpg

lees-market.jpg

218 ms

polara.jpg

polara.jpg

220 ms

Aleo-Regular.woff

Aleo-Regular.woff

151 ms

Aleo-Light.woff

Aleo-Light.woff

167 ms

Aleo-Bold.woff

Aleo-Bold.woff

172 ms

Arimo-Bold.woff

Arimo-Bold.woff

196 ms

Arimo.woff

Arimo.woff

217 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

217 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

144 ms

astrographics-3.png

astrographics-3.png

117 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

17 ms

ztaj65g8bhf8gboaldp1io16baw3ukkk.js

ztaj65g8bhf8gboaldp1io16baw3ukkk.js

144 ms

case_study_city_of_leduc_hero_image-scaled.jpg

case_study_city_of_leduc_hero_image-scaled.jpg

25 ms

SCREEN-GRAB-3-e1521501880729.jpg

SCREEN-GRAB-3-e1521501880729.jpg

18 ms

Accessibility Review

astrographic.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

astrographic.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

astrographic.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Astrographic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Astrographic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

astrographic.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Astrographic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: