3.4 sec in total
287 ms
2.8 sec
277 ms
Visit ateneorome.com now to see the best up-to-date Ateneo Rome content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ateneorome.com
Lovely, centric hotel in Rome, Ateneo Garden Palace, Termini Station area, San Lorenzo district of rome. Ideal hotel for holidays or work stopovers
Visit ateneorome.comWe analyzed Ateneorome.com page load time and found that the first response time was 287 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
ateneorome.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value12.0 s
0/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value170 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.436
21/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
287 ms
606 ms
49 ms
114 ms
223 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Ateneorome.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Code.jquery.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ateneorome.com.
Page size can be reduced by 44.9 kB (28%)
161.6 kB
116.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Ateneorome.com main page is 161.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 102.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.2 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ateneo Rome images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 58 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 719 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ateneorome.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (59%)
70
29
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ateneo Rome. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ateneorome.com
287 ms
www.ateneorome.com
606 ms
css
49 ms
reset.css
114 ms
foundation.css
223 ms
font-awesome.min.css
301 ms
isotope.css
301 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
310 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
303 ms
archtek-init.css
310 ms
jquery-ui.css
32 ms
custom.modernizr.js
330 ms
jquery-1.10.2.js
41 ms
jquery-ui.js
38 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
39 ms
api.js
55 ms
foundation.min.js
407 ms
js
66 ms
jquery.backstretch.min.js
405 ms
superfish.js
413 ms
supersubs.js
416 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
414 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.js
444 ms
jquery.transit.min.js
510 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
510 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.1.0-packed.js
623 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
523 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
523 ms
jquery.hoverdir.js
554 ms
jquery.validationEngine-en.js
616 ms
jquery.validationEngine.js
614 ms
jquery.scrollUp.min.js
627 ms
archtek.js
627 ms
foundation.dropdown.js
659 ms
archtek.css
416 ms
analytics.js
57 ms
logo_210_4.png
166 ms
en.gif
148 ms
de.gif
149 ms
es.gif
149 ms
fr.gif
149 ms
it.gif
148 ms
jp.gif
198 ms
ru.gif
214 ms
se.gif
214 ms
loading-black.gif
218 ms
640_entrata_a_2000.jpg
807 ms
640_colazione_a_2000.jpg
816 ms
640_giardino_a_2000.jpg
989 ms
slider-shadow.png
318 ms
cam_110_c_255.jpg
415 ms
cam_222_a_255.jpg
458 ms
longues_a_255.jpg
615 ms
cam_212_a_255.jpg
617 ms
cam_308_b_255.jpg
658 ms
roof_a_255.jpg
822 ms
bar_b_255.jpg
725 ms
cam_210_a_255.jpg
863 ms
quote-bg.png
833 ms
rew_Venere.jpg
911 ms
foot_eventi.jpg
889 ms
foot_offerte.jpg
898 ms
foot_gallery.jpg
906 ms
facebook-bw.png
939 ms
facebook.png
984 ms
googleplus-bw.png
994 ms
googleplus.png
1000 ms
twitter-bw.png
1007 ms
twitter.png
1043 ms
collect
63 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
44 ms
NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMPmC6ZRbrw.woff
15 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffBzCGItzZZabuWI.woff
21 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
949 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-AMP6lQ.woff
30 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQXKMny.woff
35 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxMKTU1Kg.woff
36 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-AMP6lQ.woff
36 ms
dark-bottom.css
13 ms
ateneorome.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
ateneorome.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ateneorome.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ateneorome.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ateneorome.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ateneorome.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ateneo Rome. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: