10.7 sec in total
30 ms
9.7 sec
1000 ms
Visit aufgang.com now to see the best up-to-date Aufgang content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about aufgang.com
Visit aufgang.comWe analyzed Aufgang.com page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 10.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
aufgang.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value11.8 s
4/100
10%
Value930 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.892
3/100
15%
Value10.7 s
22/100
10%
30 ms
2965 ms
11 ms
32 ms
29 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Aufgang.com, 21% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Scontent-atl3-2.cdninstagram.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6 sec) belongs to the original domain Aufgang.com.
Page size can be reduced by 760.7 kB (11%)
7.2 MB
6.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Aufgang.com main page is 7.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 75.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Aufgang images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 337.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 337.6 kB or 34% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 281.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Aufgang.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 281.4 kB or 62% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (61%)
46
18
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Aufgang. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
aufgang.com
30 ms
www.aufgang.com
2965 ms
sbi-styles.min.css
11 ms
style.min.css
32 ms
styles.css
29 ms
css
112 ms
uncode-privacy-public.css
30 ms
trp-floater-language-switcher.css
26 ms
trp-language-switcher.css
29 ms
style.css
60 ms
uncode-icons.css
39 ms
style-custom.css
44 ms
jquery.min.js
56 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
38 ms
ai-uncode.js
38 ms
init.js
109 ms
js
280 ms
slider-pro.css
56 ms
rs6.css
253 ms
embed.min.js
276 ms
hooks.min.js
105 ms
i18n.min.js
268 ms
index.js
268 ms
index.js
269 ms
rbtools.min.js
271 ms
rs6.min.js
272 ms
js-cookie.min.js
268 ms
uncode-privacy-public.min.js
269 ms
plugins.js
273 ms
app.js
272 ms
jquery.sliderPro.js
270 ms
sbi-scripts.min.js
269 ms
sbi-sprite.png
68 ms
Aufgang-Logo-RGB-October.jpg
68 ms
blank.gif
68 ms
placeholder.png
67 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Me5WZNCzc.ttf
410 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9vAx0_IsE.ttf
436 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5vAx0_IsE.ttf
435 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgWxPKTU1Kg.ttf
436 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlvAx0_IsE.ttf
435 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtvAx0_IsE.ttf
434 ms
uncode-icons.woff
67 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w-Y3tco5q6.ttf
435 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w-Y3tco5q6.ttf
482 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w-Y3tco5q6.ttf
482 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w-Y3tco5q6.ttf
478 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew-Y3tco5q6.ttf
479 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew-Y3tco5q6.ttf
480 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew-Y3tco5q6.ttf
478 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew-Y3tco5q6.ttf
484 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw-Y3tco5q6.ttf
484 ms
openhand.cur
201 ms
2-scaled.jpg
109 ms
4-scaled.jpg
111 ms
1-scaled.jpg
109 ms
462307500_377497621983343_3987163462465042489_nfull.webp
26 ms
461973830_1081722142817686_115676878265638046_nfull.webp
4209 ms
462024955_3476846182623144_4036097201783615814_nfull.webp
4115 ms
461805460_1083800243392607_8141712681938185500_nfull.webp
6002 ms
461868561_3836948543225872_1963027231769682430_nfull.webp
76 ms
461689274_1258406642015705_3986637238757403244_nfull.webp
76 ms
461424821_1047010710287486_1993397032117960623_nfull.webp
78 ms
461319429_952833873316663_6640050770046477944_nfull.webp
80 ms
462307500_377497621983343_3987163462465042489_n.jpg
153 ms
461868561_3836948543225872_1963027231769682430_n.jpg
137 ms
461424821_1047010710287486_1993397032117960623_n.jpg
222 ms
461689274_1258406642015705_3986637238757403244_n.jpg
250 ms
461319429_952833873316663_6640050770046477944_n.jpg
291 ms
462024955_3476846182623144_4036097201783615814_n.jpg
53 ms
461973830_1081722142817686_115676878265638046_n.jpg
20 ms
3-scaled.jpg
19 ms
461805460_1083800243392607_8141712681938185500_n.jpg
33 ms
aufgang.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
aufgang.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
aufgang.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Aufgang.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Aufgang.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
aufgang.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Aufgang. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: