Tools & Wizards About Us
auraphyll.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

auraphyll.com

Page Load Speed

14.3 sec in total

First Response

5.1 sec

Resources Loaded

8.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

auraphyll.com screenshot

About Website

Visit auraphyll.com now to see the best up-to-date Auraphyll content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about auraphyll.com

Visit auraphyll.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Auraphyll.com page load time and found that the first response time was 5.1 sec and then it took 9.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

auraphyll.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.8 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.08

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.9 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

auraphyll.com

5120 ms

offcanvas.css

182 ms

navmenu.css

184 ms

headerinfo.css

191 ms

rkit-navmenu.css

193 ms

Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (125 requests) were addressed to the original Auraphyll.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Auraphyll.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 296.5 kB (5%)

Content Size

6.0 MB

After Optimization

5.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Auraphyll.com main page is 6.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 149.1 kB

  • Original 173.4 kB
  • After minification 158.7 kB
  • After compression 24.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 149.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 14.3 kB

  • Original 5.4 MB
  • After minification 5.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Auraphyll images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 84.9 kB

  • Original 337.2 kB
  • After minification 337.2 kB
  • After compression 252.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 84.9 kB or 25% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 48.2 kB

  • Original 137.0 kB
  • After minification 136.8 kB
  • After compression 88.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Auraphyll.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.2 kB or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 81 (64%)

Requests Now

126

After Optimization

45

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 126 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Auraphyll. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 42 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

auraphyll.com

auraphyll.com

5120 ms

offcanvas.css

offcanvas.css

182 ms

navmenu.css

navmenu.css

184 ms

headerinfo.css

headerinfo.css

191 ms

rkit-navmenu.css

rkit-navmenu.css

193 ms

search.css

search.css

189 ms

rkit-blog-post.css

rkit-blog-post.css

199 ms

cta.css

cta.css

242 ms

blockquote.css

blockquote.css

246 ms

social_share.css

social_share.css

253 ms

rkit_team.css

rkit_team.css

253 ms

running_text.css

running_text.css

262 ms

animated_heading.css

animated_heading.css

263 ms

card_slider.css

card_slider.css

303 ms

accordion.css

accordion.css

307 ms

testimonial_carousel.css

testimonial_carousel.css

314 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

swiper-bundle.min.css

315 ms

tabs.css

tabs.css

323 ms

progress-bar.css

progress-bar.css

323 ms

counter.css

counter.css

365 ms

style.css

style.css

374 ms

rkit.css

rkit.css

377 ms

grid.min.css

grid.min.css

380 ms

helper-parts.min.css

helper-parts.min.css

385 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

505 ms

rtform_text.css

rtform_text.css

429 ms

rform.css

rform.css

438 ms

spinner-loading.css

spinner-loading.css

442 ms

rform-button.css

rform-button.css

443 ms

rform-select.css

rform-select.css

447 ms

rform-radiobutton.css

rform-radiobutton.css

491 ms

rform-checkbox.css

rform-checkbox.css

500 ms

intlTelInput.css

intlTelInput.css

523 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

521 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

520 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

556 ms

css

css

27 ms

chart.min.js

chart.min.js

34 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

527 ms

post-12.css

post-12.css

400 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

400 ms

post-16.css

post-16.css

465 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

400 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

440 ms

offcanvas.js

offcanvas.js

446 ms

navmenu.js

navmenu.js

406 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

474 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

444 ms

card_slider.js

card_slider.js

448 ms

animated_heading.js

animated_heading.js

453 ms

accordion.js

accordion.js

469 ms

bar_chart.js

bar_chart.js

427 ms

line_chart.js

line_chart.js

454 ms

pie_chart.js

pie_chart.js

449 ms

swiper-bundle.min.js

swiper-bundle.min.js

522 ms

rtform_text.js

rtform_text.js

458 ms

rform_select.js

rform_select.js

463 ms

rform_tel_input.js

rform_tel_input.js

425 ms

rform.js

rform.js

450 ms

intl_tel_input.min.js

intl_tel_input.min.js

454 ms

rkit-navmenu.js

rkit-navmenu.js

536 ms

social_share.js

social_share.js

533 ms

testimonial_carousel.js

testimonial_carousel.js

481 ms

tabs.js

tabs.js

477 ms

progress.js

progress.js

477 ms

counter.js

counter.js

475 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

432 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

424 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

435 ms

swiper.min.js

swiper.min.js

503 ms

fslightbox.min.js

fslightbox.min.js

440 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

445 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

498 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

410 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

448 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

474 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

432 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

423 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

456 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

452 ms

elementor.js

elementor.js

442 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

409 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

404 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

410 ms

logo.png

logo.png

283 ms

auraphyll-slider.jpg

auraphyll-slider.jpg

455 ms

about-us.jpg

about-us.jpg

456 ms

icon-19-1.png

icon-19-1.png

284 ms

organic-farming-auraphyll.jpg

organic-farming-auraphyll.jpg

402 ms

auraphyll-1.jpg

auraphyll-1.jpg

364 ms

auraphyll-2-1.jpg

auraphyll-2-1.jpg

460 ms

background-1.jpg

background-1.jpg

346 ms

vaerer2.jpg

vaerer2.jpg

466 ms

icon-14.png

icon-14.png

428 ms

rhyzo-1.jpg

rhyzo-1.jpg

427 ms

icon-13.png

icon-13.png

452 ms

Magarsakthi.jpg

Magarsakthi.jpg

478 ms

icon-12.png

icon-12.png

478 ms

chitosun1.jpg

chitosun1.jpg

483 ms

icon-11.png

icon-11.png

485 ms

chitang1.jpg

chitang1.jpg

542 ms

icon-10.png

icon-10.png

510 ms

mizuchi1.jpg

mizuchi1.jpg

539 ms

icon-9-1.png

icon-9-1.png

537 ms

Boomax.jpg

Boomax.jpg

512 ms

Thulir.jpg

Thulir.jpg

563 ms

Vilasea.jpg

Vilasea.jpg

584 ms

photo-10.jpg

photo-10.jpg

556 ms

testimonial-1-1-150x150.png

testimonial-1-1-150x150.png

510 ms

testimonial-3-1-150x150.png

testimonial-3-1-150x150.png

483 ms

testimonial-2-1-150x150.png

testimonial-2-1-150x150.png

479 ms

auraphyll-3.jpg

auraphyll-3.jpg

533 ms

Unleashing-the-Potential-of-Chitang-Natural-Boost-for-Watermelon-Cultivation.jpg

Unleashing-the-Potential-of-Chitang-Natural-Boost-for-Watermelon-Cultivation.jpg

525 ms

Revolutionizing-Indian-Agriculture-Mizuch-and-the-Sustainable-Growth-of-Eggplants.jpg

Revolutionizing-Indian-Agriculture-Mizuch-and-the-Sustainable-Growth-of-Eggplants.jpg

525 ms

Peanut-Crop-Productivity.jpg

Peanut-Crop-Productivity.jpg

508 ms

Grape-Cultivation.jpg

Grape-Cultivation.jpg

509 ms

Biostimulant.jpg

Biostimulant.jpg

639 ms

Maximizing-Cucumber-Yield-and-Quality-with-Innovative-Agricultural-Solutions.webp

Maximizing-Cucumber-Yield-and-Quality-with-Innovative-Agricultural-Solutions.webp

1699 ms

blog-1-1.jpg

blog-1-1.jpg

613 ms

gallery-01-1.jpg

gallery-01-1.jpg

526 ms

gallery-02.jpg

gallery-02.jpg

507 ms

gallery-03.jpg

gallery-03.jpg

506 ms

gallery-04.jpg

gallery-04.jpg

503 ms

gallery-05.jpg

gallery-05.jpg

488 ms

gallery-06.jpg

gallery-06.jpg

451 ms

gallery-07.jpg

gallery-07.jpg

478 ms

background-2.jpg

background-2.jpg

458 ms

Accessibility Review

auraphyll.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

auraphyll.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

auraphyll.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Auraphyll.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Auraphyll.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

auraphyll.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Auraphyll. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: