Tools & Wizards About Us
austinbackflowtesting.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 86

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

austinbackflowtesting.net

Austin Backflow Testing | Smart Earth Backflow Testing

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

101 ms

Resources Loaded

681 ms

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

austinbackflowtesting.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to austinbackflowtesting.net homepage info - get ready to check Austin Backflow Testing best content right away, or after learning these important things about austinbackflowtesting.net

Irrigation backflow testing and repair. Licensed. We manage all your records with the local government. Austin, Round Rock, Pflugerville and Hutto.

Visit austinbackflowtesting.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Austinbackflowtesting.net page load time and found that the first response time was 101 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

austinbackflowtesting.net performance score

86

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

49/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

austinbackflowtesting.net

101 ms

austinbackflowtesting.net

114 ms

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

29 ms

Smart-Earth-Backflow-Testing-Logo.png

30 ms

lazyload.min.js

14 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Austinbackflowtesting.net, 5% (1 request) were made to Google.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (371 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 321.4 kB (35%)

Content Size

906.0 kB

After Optimization

584.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Austinbackflowtesting.net main page is 906.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 503.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 321.3 kB

  • Original 377.1 kB
  • After minification 371.2 kB
  • After compression 55.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 321.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 503.4 kB
  • After minification 503.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Austin Backflow Testing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 79 B

  • Original 25.5 kB
  • After minification 25.5 kB
  • After compression 25.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (29%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Austin Backflow Testing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

austinbackflowtesting.net

austinbackflowtesting.net

101 ms

austinbackflowtesting.net

austinbackflowtesting.net

114 ms

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

apbct-public-bundle.min.js

29 ms

Smart-Earth-Backflow-Testing-Logo.png

Smart-Earth-Backflow-Testing-Logo.png

30 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

14 ms

austinbackflowmain.jpg

austinbackflowmain.jpg

74 ms

142415214_m_normal_none.jpg

142415214_m_normal_none.jpg

31 ms

Untitled-1.png

Untitled-1.png

72 ms

144123776_m_normal_none-1024x683.jpg

144123776_m_normal_none-1024x683.jpg

24 ms

142415214_m_normal_none-1024x683.jpg

142415214_m_normal_none-1024x683.jpg

22 ms

144123776_m_normal_none-768x513.jpg

144123776_m_normal_none-768x513.jpg

30 ms

94747603_l_normal_none-768x512.jpg

94747603_l_normal_none-768x512.jpg

31 ms

Document-white.svg

Document-white.svg

29 ms

Backflow-Prevention.jpg

Backflow-Prevention.jpg

31 ms

bigstock-Bluebonnet-13906184-300x200.jpg

bigstock-Bluebonnet-13906184-300x200.jpg

37 ms

bigstock-Garden-Irrigation-System-38458408-300x190.jpg

bigstock-Garden-Irrigation-System-38458408-300x190.jpg

38 ms

bigstock-Running-Water-3299846-300x199.jpg

bigstock-Running-Water-3299846-300x199.jpg

37 ms

embed

embed

371 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

18 ms

js

js

35 ms

Accessibility Review

austinbackflowtesting.net accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

austinbackflowtesting.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

austinbackflowtesting.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Austinbackflowtesting.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Austinbackflowtesting.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

austinbackflowtesting.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Austin Backflow Testing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: