Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

austineng.com

Austin Engineering | Mining Equipment Engineering & Fabrication

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

663 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

279 ms

austineng.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to austineng.com homepage info - get ready to check Austin Eng best content right away, or after learning these important things about austineng.com

At Austin, we have decades of experience in engineering and manufacturing mining equipment. We work with the world's top miners to engineers.

Visit austineng.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Austineng.com page load time and found that the first response time was 663 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

austineng.com performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

86/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

austineng.com

663 ms

www.austineng.com

870 ms

www.austineng.com

1108 ms

bg-arrow.png

183 ms

www.austineng.com

1109 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Austineng.com, 20% (1 request) were made to Cdn-iladpgb.nitrocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Austineng.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 392.5 kB (85%)

Content Size

462.1 kB

After Optimization

69.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Austineng.com main page is 462.1 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 461.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 392.5 kB

  • Original 461.9 kB
  • After minification 461.8 kB
  • After compression 69.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 392.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 180 B
  • After minification 180 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Austin Eng images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Austin Eng. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

austineng.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

austineng.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

austineng.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Austineng.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Austineng.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: