Report Summary

  • 6

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

autogramma.ru

Autogramma

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

528 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

141 ms

autogramma.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to autogramma.ru homepage info - get ready to check Autogramma best content right away, or after learning these important things about autogramma.ru

Visit autogramma.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Autogramma.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 528 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

autogramma.ru performance score

6

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value58.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value60.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value60.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,980 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.286

42/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value65.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

autogramma.ru

528 ms

Overmeet%20the%20Future2.gif

685 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Autogramma.ru and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (685 ms) belongs to the original domain Autogramma.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 25 B (24%)

Content Size

106 B

After Optimization

81 B

In fact, the total size of Autogramma.ru main page is 106 B. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 106 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 25 B

  • Original 106 B
  • After minification 103 B
  • After compression 81 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25 B or 24% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

1

After Optimization

1

The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Autogramma. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

autogramma.ru accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

autogramma.ru best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

autogramma.ru SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Autogramma.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Autogramma.ru main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Autogramma. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: