4.6 sec in total
563 ms
3.5 sec
520 ms
Click here to check amazing Autolike content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about autolike.co
The domain name autolike.co is for sale. Make an offer or buy it now at a set price.
Visit autolike.coWe analyzed Autolike.co page load time and found that the first response time was 563 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
autolike.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value3.5 s
63/100
25%
Value5.2 s
59/100
10%
Value3,450 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.036
100/100
15%
Value9.9 s
27/100
10%
563 ms
48 ms
47 ms
451 ms
762 ms
Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Autolike.co, 11% (9 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net and 10% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Autolike.co.
Page size can be reduced by 590.5 kB (49%)
1.2 MB
625.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Autolike.co main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 450.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.4 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.1 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Autolike images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 195.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 195.0 kB or 49% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 367.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Autolike.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 367.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (70%)
67
20
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Autolike. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
autolike.co
563 ms
font-awesome.min.css
48 ms
css
47 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
451 ms
bootstrap.css
762 ms
flat-ui.css
620 ms
flatten.css
321 ms
flat-prettify.css
311 ms
font-awesome.min.css
508 ms
css
63 ms
css
64 ms
css
77 ms
style.css
623 ms
animate.css
649 ms
font-awesome.min.css
28 ms
red.css
598 ms
wide.css
675 ms
like.css
748 ms
display.js
57 ms
pop.js
33 ms
css
68 ms
css
18 ms
jquery.js
773 ms
foundation.min.js
1087 ms
hoverIntent.js
659 ms
superfish.min.js
690 ms
morphext.min.js
749 ms
wow.min.js
759 ms
jquery.slicknav.min.js
820 ms
waypoints.min.js
859 ms
jquery.animateNumber.min.js
899 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
911 ms
adsbygoogle.js
24 ms
a
15 ms
css
61 ms
font.css
458 ms
base.css
513 ms
font-awesome.min.css
558 ms
fontello.css
581 ms
skeleton.css
593 ms
javascript.css
611 ms
shortcodes.css
675 ms
white.css
725 ms
custom.css
729 ms
puscript1458436561696.php
152 ms
pop.js
95 ms
analytics.js
91 ms
bg.png
74 ms
load.gif
931 ms
bg-triang.png
70 ms
banner.jpg
700 ms
collect
270 ms
checkInventory.php
103 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
140 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
189 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
221 ms
BVtM30trf7q_jfqYeHfjtA.woff
220 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
19 ms
fontawesome-webfonte63c.woff
492 ms
fontawesome-webfontf77b.woff
241 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
10 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xF1YPouZEKgzpqZW9wN-3Ek.woff
63 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xONSK5BxN3NFS4EJkViHIqo.woff
128 ms
6q1c0ofG6NKsEhAc2eh-3dIh4imgI8P11RFo6YPCPC0.woff
177 ms
DqeGA7eaz0hhOYTfkeJBIA.woff
169 ms
Roboto-Regular-webfont.woff
360 ms
Roboto-Medium-webfont.woff
372 ms
10518636_575732989201974_4968219913367700142_n.jpg
315 ms
ca-pub-1346074036556705.js
343 ms
zrt_lookup.html
215 ms
show_ads_impl.js
135 ms
s.gif
103 ms
12509123_444247215780984_6624314146778292032_n.jpg
231 ms
fontawesome-webfontf77b.ttf
187 ms
11403325_1446933725623299_4895466426552478401_n.jpg
180 ms
ads
66 ms
osd.js
33 ms
12728783_124984107889785_8257243777564280283_n.jpg
137 ms
1934525_575231942652058_3588005943239327692_n.jpg
103 ms
12729173_123890944665716_2307457097648104275_n.jpg
136 ms
12814802_1689654127969676_7581125863956189421_n.jpg
203 ms
12066072_144757795874663_6033575642163169860_n.jpg
132 ms
10301453_676493382490667_3572003659443473190_n.jpg
158 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
164 ms
autolike.co accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
autolike.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
autolike.co SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Autolike.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Autolike.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
autolike.co
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Autolike. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: