Tools & Wizards About Us
automationimage.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

automationimage.com

Automation Image

Page Load Speed

2.9 sec in total

First Response

784 ms

Resources Loaded

2 sec

Page Rendered

165 ms

automationimage.com screenshot

About Website

Visit automationimage.com now to see the best up-to-date Automation Image content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about automationimage.com

Telecommunications industry leader. Our routing technology is used nationwide. We deliver IT consulting, systems integration and outsourcing solutions. Founded 1982 in Texas.

Visit automationimage.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Automationimage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 784 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

automationimage.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value700 ms

43/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.085

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

automationimage.net

784 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

86 ms

style.min.css

142 ms

styles.css

156 ms

settings.css

157 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Automationimage.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (784 ms) relates to the external source Automationimage.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 340.7 kB (18%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Automationimage.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 178.8 kB

  • Original 210.7 kB
  • After minification 205.4 kB
  • After compression 31.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 178.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 153.1 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Automation Image needs image optimization as it can save up to 153.1 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 833 B

  • Original 282.2 kB
  • After minification 282.2 kB
  • After compression 281.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

  • Original 93.9 kB
  • After minification 93.9 kB
  • After compression 86.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Automationimage.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (49%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

18

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Automation Image. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

automationimage.net

automationimage.net

784 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

86 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

142 ms

styles.css

styles.css

156 ms

settings.css

settings.css

157 ms

css

css

33 ms

style.css

style.css

274 ms

ilightbox.css

ilightbox.css

176 ms

animations.css

animations.css

197 ms

all.css

all.css

37 ms

v4-shims.css

v4-shims.css

53 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

264 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

210 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

353 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

305 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

225 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

238 ms

index.js

index.js

280 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

458 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

292 ms

AILogo-1x-4.png

AILogo-1x-4.png

249 ms

shutterstock_188834075.jpg

shutterstock_188834075.jpg

235 ms

shutterstock_167763245_fade2.jpg

shutterstock_167763245_fade2.jpg

234 ms

hand-globe-blue1.png

hand-globe-blue1.png

189 ms

shutterstock_82087834-Converted.jpg

shutterstock_82087834-Converted.jpg

328 ms

shutterstock_111524477-Strip2.jpg

shutterstock_111524477-Strip2.jpg

187 ms

shutterstock_91041746-Converted.jpg

shutterstock_91041746-Converted.jpg

234 ms

shutterstock_106636133-Right.jpg

shutterstock_106636133-Right.jpg

293 ms

AILogo-2x.png

AILogo-2x.png

332 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

45 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf

45 ms

shutterstock_83814199-Converted-460x295.jpg

shutterstock_83814199-Converted-460x295.jpg

307 ms

shutterstock_125338145-Converted-460x295.jpg

shutterstock_125338145-Converted-460x295.jpg

470 ms

gradient4.png

gradient4.png

157 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexYMUdjFnmg.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexYMUdjFnmg.ttf

187 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexYMUdjFnmg.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexYMUdjFnmg.ttf

118 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

15 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

29 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

217 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

187 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

242 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

244 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

247 ms

gradient4.png

gradient4.png

222 ms

Accessibility Review

automationimage.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

automationimage.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

automationimage.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Automationimage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Automationimage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

automationimage.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Automation Image. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: