Tools & Wizards About Us
avagostar.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 39% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

avagostar.net

آواگستر ارایه دهنده اینترنت پرسرعت در ایران

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

719 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

222 ms

avagostar.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Avagostar content for Iran. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about avagostar.net

آواگستر ارایه دهنده اینترنت پرسرعت بی سیم، TD-LTE و ADSL2+ در ایران دارنده پروانه سروکو (Servco)

Visit avagostar.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Avagostar.net page load time and found that the first response time was 719 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

avagostar.net performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,520 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.042

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.9 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

avagostar.net

719 ms

style.css

189 ms

css

24 ms

font-awesome.min.css

280 ms

animate.css

285 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Avagostar.net, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Avagostar.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 811.3 kB (57%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

620.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Avagostar.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 568.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 47.7 kB

  • Original 57.9 kB
  • After minification 49.2 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.6 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 135.1 kB

  • Original 568.0 kB
  • After minification 432.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Avagostar needs image optimization as it can save up to 135.1 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 411.1 kB

  • Original 549.9 kB
  • After minification 437.8 kB
  • After compression 138.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 411.1 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 217.5 kB

  • Original 256.2 kB
  • After minification 223.5 kB
  • After compression 38.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Avagostar.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 217.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (46%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Avagostar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

avagostar.net

avagostar.net

719 ms

style.css

style.css

189 ms

css

css

24 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

280 ms

animate.css

animate.css

285 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

283 ms

slick.css

slick.css

200 ms

style.css

style.css

744 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

464 ms

default.css

default.css

380 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

768 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

700 ms

jssor.js

jssor.js

698 ms

jssor.slider.js

jssor.slider.js

855 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

473 ms

jquery.animateNumber.min.js

jquery.animateNumber.min.js

666 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

860 ms

jquery.easypiechart.min.js

jquery.easypiechart.min.js

755 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

861 ms

jquery.sharrre.min.js

jquery.sharrre.min.js

801 ms

jquery.elevateZoom-3.0.8.min.js

jquery.elevateZoom-3.0.8.min.js

942 ms

jquery.placeholder.js

jquery.placeholder.js

940 ms

script.js

script.js

1050 ms

ga.js

ga.js

24 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

947 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

23 ms

logo.png

logo.png

707 ms

logo.png

logo.png

627 ms

bg.png

bg.png

810 ms

btn.png

btn.png

626 ms

plane.png

plane.png

1031 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

643 ms

off.png

off.png

727 ms

blue_box.png

blue_box.png

824 ms

red_box.png

red_box.png

931 ms

green_box.png

green_box.png

983 ms

yeallo_box.png

yeallo_box.png

1010 ms

label_blue.png

label_blue.png

1001 ms

label_red.png

label_red.png

1014 ms

label_green.png

label_green.png

1121 ms

label_yeallo.png

label_yeallo.png

1167 ms

mojavez1_thumbnail.jpg

mojavez1_thumbnail.jpg

1197 ms

mojavez2_thumbnail.jpg

mojavez2_thumbnail.jpg

1199 ms

mojavez3_thumbnail.jpg

mojavez3_thumbnail.jpg

1208 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

1199 ms

a21.png

a21.png

1293 ms

BKoodakBold.woff

BKoodakBold.woff

1430 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1559 ms

check.png

check.png

1215 ms

tehran.jpg

tehran.jpg

1401 ms

Accessibility Review

avagostar.net accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

avagostar.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

avagostar.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FA

  • Language Claimed

    FA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8ارائه

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Avagostar.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Avagostar.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8ارائه. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

avagostar.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Avagostar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: