Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 53% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

avena.de

Startseite

Page Load Speed

8.3 sec in total

First Response

811 ms

Resources Loaded

6.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

avena.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Avena content for Austria. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about avena.de

Modisch und bequem! Jetzt entdecken: Schuhe, Hallux-Schuhe, Wäsche, Mode und Accessoires ✓ 3 Jahre Garantie ✓ Kauf auf Rechnung ✓ Kostenlose Retoure.

Visit avena.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Avena.de page load time and found that the first response time was 811 ms and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

avena.de performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,580 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.avena.de

811 ms

kameleoon.js

183 ms

econda-recommendations.js

788 ms

cmp.min.css

191 ms

responsive.css

1178 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Avena.de, 75% (42 requests) were made to Media.avena.de and 9% (5 requests) were made to Cdn.consentmanager.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) relates to the external source Media.avena.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (61%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Avena.de main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 250.1 kB

  • Original 283.1 kB
  • After minification 243.9 kB
  • After compression 33.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 39.2 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 250.1 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 905 B

  • Original 529.7 kB
  • After minification 528.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Avena images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 421.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 458.2 kB

  • Original 583.0 kB
  • After minification 567.5 kB
  • After compression 124.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Avena.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 458.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (18%)

Requests Now

51

After Optimization

42

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Avena. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

avena.de accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

avena.de best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

avena.de SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Avena.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Avena.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Avena. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: