1.9 sec in total
39 ms
1.1 sec
734 ms
Click here to check amazing Avid Ratings content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about avidratings.com
Avid Ratings works with leading homebuilders to help drive sales, increase brand awareness, and identify areas of success and opportunity.
Visit avidratings.comWe analyzed Avidratings.com page load time and found that the first response time was 39 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
avidratings.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value10.4 s
0/100
25%
Value5.5 s
56/100
10%
Value560 ms
53/100
30%
Value0.026
100/100
15%
Value9.5 s
30/100
10%
39 ms
419 ms
150 ms
138 ms
201 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Avidratings.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (419 ms) belongs to the original domain Avidratings.com.
Page size can be reduced by 308.6 kB (12%)
2.5 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Avidratings.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 133.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 133.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 160.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Avid Ratings images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 8.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Avidratings.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (58%)
73
31
The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Avid Ratings. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
avidratings.com
39 ms
avidratings.com
419 ms
css
150 ms
style.min.css
138 ms
frontend_blocks_deprecated_v2.css
201 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
195 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
198 ms
dashicons.min.css
197 ms
wpr-hamburger.css
188 ms
wprmenu.css
193 ms
wpr-icons.css
194 ms
custom-style-blocks.css
215 ms
style.css
204 ms
style-2.css
195 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
194 ms
display-structure.css
197 ms
pum-site-styles.css
200 ms
jetpack.css
227 ms
frontend_blocks_deprecated_v2.js
223 ms
jquery.min.js
232 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
223 ms
modernizr.custom.js
223 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
223 ms
wprmenu.js
223 ms
underscore.min.js
224 ms
backbone.min.js
230 ms
front-end-deps.js
230 ms
front-end.js
234 ms
front-end.js
233 ms
errorHandling.js
231 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
178 ms
js
204 ms
navigation.js
226 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
225 ms
core.min.js
227 ms
pum-site-scripts.js
231 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
275 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
226 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
228 ms
vimeo.min.js
227 ms
e-202240.js
168 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
72 ms
css
44 ms
gtm.js
88 ms
homekeep-logo-horizontal.svg
58 ms
background.png
93 ms
arlogo.svg
57 ms
homegraphic-v2.svg
59 ms
rinnai.png
80 ms
layer-39@2x.png
79 ms
simonds-logo-2017-display.png
83 ms
meritage-homes.png
81 ms
layer-42@2x.png
83 ms
stanley-martin.png
85 ms
Brookfield.png
83 ms
Richmond.png
84 ms
Benchmarking-4.png
86 ms
photo-1474181487882-5abf3f0ba6c2-scaled.jpeg
107 ms
avi-werde-hHz4yrvxwlA-unsplash-scaled.jpg
93 ms
Time_Magazine_logo.svg
88 ms
The_Wall_Street_Journal.svg
85 ms
MarketWatch_Logo.svg
95 ms
The_Washington_Post_Logo.svg
93 ms
Yahoo_logo.svg
98 ms
facebook-footer.svg
97 ms
twitter-footer.svg
102 ms
instagram-footer.svg
99 ms
linkedin-footer.svg
102 ms
analytics.js
31 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
45 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff
76 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
76 ms
collect
34 ms
video-cover.png
43 ms
mejs-controls.svg
36 ms
collect
59 ms
pd.js
29 ms
ga-audiences
33 ms
analytics
105 ms
avidratings.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
avidratings.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
avidratings.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Avidratings.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Avidratings.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
avidratings.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Avid Ratings. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: