Tools & Wizards About Us
awebscraping.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

awebscraping.com

Web Data Scraping Company in India : Data Extraction, Web Crawling

Page Load Speed

10.1 sec in total

First Response

435 ms

Resources Loaded

9 sec

Page Rendered

600 ms

awebscraping.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to awebscraping.com homepage info - get ready to check A Web Scraping best content right away, or after learning these important things about awebscraping.com

Looking for Web data Scraping, data extraction, web cralling Services? We have Web Scraping experts to extract any data into structure format.

Visit awebscraping.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Awebscraping.com page load time and found that the first response time was 435 ms and then it took 9.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

awebscraping.com performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,480 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.184

66/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.7 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

awebscraping.com

435 ms

awebscraping.com

2669 ms

www.awebscraping.com

1720 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

198 ms

style.min.css

397 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (79 requests) were addressed to the original Awebscraping.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Awebscraping.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 276.3 kB (18%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Awebscraping.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 726.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 263.4 kB

  • Original 296.7 kB
  • After minification 291.7 kB
  • After compression 33.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 263.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 726.0 kB
  • After minification 722.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. A Web Scraping images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 280.1 kB
  • After minification 280.1 kB
  • After compression 278.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 216.2 kB
  • After minification 215.4 kB
  • After compression 209.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Awebscraping.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (60%)

Requests Now

78

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of A Web Scraping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

awebscraping.com

awebscraping.com

435 ms

awebscraping.com

awebscraping.com

2669 ms

www.awebscraping.com

www.awebscraping.com

1720 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

198 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

397 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

592 ms

styles.css

styles.css

591 ms

settings.css

settings.css

597 ms

Defaults.css

Defaults.css

595 ms

js_composer_front_custom.css

js_composer_front_custom.css

1039 ms

css

css

28 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

1059 ms

back-compat.min.css

back-compat.min.css

787 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

789 ms

fontello.min.css

fontello.min.css

792 ms

post-type.min.css

post-type.min.css

796 ms

custom.css

custom.css

1186 ms

media.css

media.css

989 ms

mega-menu.css

mega-menu.css

993 ms

the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css

the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css

995 ms

post-type-dynamic.css

post-type-dynamic.css

1197 ms

style.css

style.css

1198 ms

css

css

29 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1197 ms

headings.min.css

headings.min.css

1243 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

1267 ms

info-box.min.css

info-box.min.css

1382 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1581 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1392 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

1593 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

1451 ms

above-the-fold.min.js

above-the-fold.min.js

1475 ms

ultimate-params.min.js

ultimate-params.min.js

1576 ms

jquery-appear.min.js

jquery-appear.min.js

1580 ms

custom.min.js

custom.min.js

1658 ms

headings.min.js

headings.min.js

1684 ms

css

css

27 ms

stripes.css

stripes.css

1809 ms

background-style.min.css

background-style.min.css

1810 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

1981 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1811 ms

js

js

63 ms

legacy.min.js

legacy.min.js

1863 ms

post-type.min.js

post-type.min.js

1727 ms

info-box.min.js

info-box.min.js

1584 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1393 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

1422 ms

ultimate_bg.min.js

ultimate_bg.min.js

1482 ms

vhparallax.min.js

vhparallax.min.js

1522 ms

awebscraping-logo50.png

awebscraping-logo50.png

996 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

999 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

831 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

830 ms

font

font

45 ms

Defaults.woff

Defaults.woff

897 ms

font

font

45 ms

font

font

45 ms

icomoon-the7-social-icons-16x16.ttf

icomoon-the7-social-icons-16x16.ttf

829 ms

widget

widget

1439 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

267 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

278 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

273 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

271 ms

t-img054.jpg

t-img054.jpg

269 ms

t-img047.jpg

t-img047.jpg

490 ms

t-img050.jpg

t-img050.jpg

456 ms

t-img049.jpg

t-img049.jpg

652 ms

t-img047.jpg

t-img047.jpg

899 ms

t-img054.jpg

t-img054.jpg

899 ms

icomoon-arrows-carousel-32x32.ttf

icomoon-arrows-carousel-32x32.ttf

433 ms

img020-60x60.jpg

img020-60x60.jpg

432 ms

s007-60x60.jpg

s007-60x60.jpg

432 ms

img-about01-60x60.jpg

img-about01-60x60.jpg

432 ms

s001-60x60.jpg

s001-60x60.jpg

432 ms

s009-60x60.jpg

s009-60x60.jpg

599 ms

s008-60x60.jpg

s008-60x60.jpg

600 ms

ecommerce-scrapers-1-60x60.png

ecommerce-scrapers-1-60x60.png

601 ms

Airbnb-Scraper-60x60.jpeg

Airbnb-Scraper-60x60.jpeg

605 ms

Google-Map-Scrapers-60x60.jpeg

Google-Map-Scrapers-60x60.jpeg

630 ms

glassdoor-60x60.jpeg

glassdoor-60x60.jpeg

634 ms

LinkedIn-Scrapers-60x60.jpeg

LinkedIn-Scrapers-60x60.jpeg

841 ms

js

js

68 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

63 ms

collect

collect

39 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

468 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

468 ms

t-img050.jpg

t-img050.jpg

800 ms

t-img049.jpg

t-img049.jpg

305 ms

website

website

890 ms

t-img047.jpg

t-img047.jpg

588 ms

t-img054.jpg

t-img054.jpg

625 ms

Accessibility Review

awebscraping.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

awebscraping.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

awebscraping.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Awebscraping.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Awebscraping.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

awebscraping.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of A Web Scraping. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: