5 sec in total
1.5 sec
2.4 sec
1.1 sec
Visit axelscript.com now to see the best up-to-date Axelscript content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about axelscript.com
Axel Jensen writes on Coldfusion, Flex and other stuff...
Visit axelscript.comWe analyzed Axelscript.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
axelscript.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0.6 s
100/100
25%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
1462 ms
565 ms
310 ms
321 ms
411 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Axelscript.com, 8% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Axelscript.com.
Page size can be reduced by 169.4 kB (65%)
262.3 kB
92.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Axelscript.com main page is 262.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 147.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Axelscript needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.6 kB or 47% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 80.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 80.1 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 36.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Axelscript.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (69%)
36
11
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Axelscript. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
axelscript.com
1462 ms
style.css
565 ms
subscriptions.css
310 ms
widgets.css
321 ms
sharing.css
411 ms
jquery.js
678 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
325 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
6 ms
gprofiles.js
55 ms
wpgroho.js
314 ms
show_ads.js
5 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
94 ms
e-201611.js
5 ms
e-201611.js
22 ms
myBG.png
201 ms
search_button.gif
201 ms
someimage.gif
361 ms
commented_v.gif
200 ms
h2navbg.gif
199 ms
bullet.gif
200 ms
fr.gif
289 ms
de.gif
290 ms
es.gif
292 ms
it.gif
295 ms
zrt_lookup.html
151 ms
show_ads_impl.js
151 ms
g.gif
130 ms
footerbg.gif
229 ms
hovercard.css
58 ms
services.css
59 ms
ads
378 ms
osd.js
22 ms
css
48 ms
m_js_controller.js
22 ms
abg.js
27 ms
x_button_blue2.png
22 ms
s
18 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
15 ms
PuwvqkdbcqU-fCZ9Ed-b7RsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
13 ms
axelscript.com accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
axelscript.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
axelscript.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Axelscript.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Axelscript.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
axelscript.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Axelscript. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: