1.7 sec in total
157 ms
1.4 sec
159 ms
Welcome to axigent.net homepage info - get ready to check Axigent best content right away, or after learning these important things about axigent.net
Secure your business with top-notch cybersecurity services and IT solutions. Our Dallas and Amarillo-based IT support company offers next-generation Cisco firewall solutions, empowering small business...
Visit axigent.netWe analyzed Axigent.net page load time and found that the first response time was 157 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
axigent.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value11.2 s
0/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value320 ms
77/100
30%
Value0.104
88/100
15%
Value9.7 s
28/100
10%
157 ms
222 ms
88 ms
122 ms
125 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Axigent.net, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (787 ms) relates to the external source Snid.snitcher.com.
Page size can be reduced by 88.8 kB (11%)
780.8 kB
692.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Axigent.net main page is 780.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 561.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.7 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Axigent images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 23.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.4 kB or 20% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Axigent.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.7 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (73%)
44
12
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Axigent. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
axigent.net
157 ms
www.axigent.net
222 ms
bootstrap.css
88 ms
style.css
122 ms
camera.css
125 ms
MyFontsWebfontsKit.css
122 ms
jquery.js
172 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
126 ms
device.min.js
132 ms
js
63 ms
js
132 ms
1041.js
33 ms
crewhu-testimonials
311 ms
bootstrap.min.js
162 ms
tm-scripts.js
161 ms
css
38 ms
font-awesome.min.css
28 ms
animate.css
45 ms
css
53 ms
css
58 ms
css
59 ms
8425065.js
787 ms
logo.png
41 ms
HIPAA-Seal-of-Compliance-Hi-res.png
75 ms
globalnetwork.jpg
144 ms
314F1E_2_0.woff
81 ms
314F1E_1_0.woff
135 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
19 ms
image.png
69 ms
jquery.cookie.js
57 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
57 ms
tmstickup.js
57 ms
jquery.ui.totop.js
57 ms
superfish.js
58 ms
jquery.rd-navbar.js
81 ms
wow.js
88 ms
jquery.mobile.customized.min.js
83 ms
camera.js
89 ms
jquery.form.min.js
88 ms
jquery.rd-mailform.min.js
84 ms
widgets.js
19 ms
sdk.js
18 ms
jquery.rd-parallax.js
122 ms
sdk.js
11 ms
58 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
28 ms
camera-loader.gif
51 ms
1.jpg
91 ms
settings
97 ms
2.jpg
83 ms
axigent.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
axigent.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
axigent.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Axigent.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Axigent.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
axigent.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Axigent. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: