Tools & Wizards About Us
axilweb.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

axilweb.com

Axilweb – Brewing Tech Products

Page Load Speed

8.3 sec in total

First Response

512 ms

Resources Loaded

7.4 sec

Page Rendered

454 ms

axilweb.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to axilweb.com homepage info - get ready to check Axilweb best content for Bangladesh right away, or after learning these important things about axilweb.com

We are a team of passionate individuals who go the extra mile to create wonderful experiences for your business.

Visit axilweb.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Axilweb.com page load time and found that the first response time was 512 ms and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

axilweb.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.4 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,310 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.5 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

axilweb.com

512 ms

www.axilweb.com

1468 ms

gtm.js

62 ms

styles.css

252 ms

widget-options.css

498 ms

Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Axilweb.com, 12% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Axilweb.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (69%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

620.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Axilweb.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 63.1 kB

  • Original 77.3 kB
  • After minification 63.1 kB
  • After compression 14.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.2 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.1 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 4.7 kB
  • After minification 3.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Axilweb needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 677.0 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 495.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 677.0 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 626.6 kB

  • Original 734.2 kB
  • After minification 688.2 kB
  • After compression 107.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Axilweb.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 626.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (78%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Axilweb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

axilweb.com

axilweb.com

512 ms

www.axilweb.com

www.axilweb.com

1468 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

62 ms

styles.css

styles.css

252 ms

widget-options.css

widget-options.css

498 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

965 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

1972 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

987 ms

post-1976.css

post-1976.css

743 ms

post-1973.css

post-1973.css

745 ms

style.css

style.css

744 ms

css

css

34 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1730 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

fontawesome-all.min.css

1237 ms

chosen.min.css

chosen.min.css

991 ms

slick.css

slick.css

1204 ms

slick-theme.css

slick-theme.css

1233 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

1242 ms

main.css

main.css

1924 ms

style.css

style.css

1976 ms

css

css

49 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1734 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1485 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

1994 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

1992 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

1993 ms

index.js

index.js

2165 ms

index.js

index.js

2213 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

2215 ms

api.js

api.js

39 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

2222 ms

index.js

index.js

2224 ms

modernizr-3.6.0.min.js

modernizr-3.6.0.min.js

2263 ms

easing-1.3.js

easing-1.3.js

2404 ms

jquery.waypoints.min.js

jquery.waypoints.min.js

2460 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

2707 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

2468 ms

jquery.ScrollMagic.min.js

jquery.ScrollMagic.min.js

2469 ms

jquery.TweenMax.min.js

jquery.TweenMax.min.js

2718 ms

animation.gsap.min.js

animation.gsap.min.js

2643 ms

scrollReveal.js

scrollReveal.js

2705 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

2716 ms

typed.js

typed.js

2472 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

2392 ms

lottie.js

lottie.js

2458 ms

main.js

main.js

2214 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

2223 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

2003 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

1983 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

2137 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

2012 ms

Logo-website-footer.png

Logo-website-footer.png

267 ms

PartnerBadgeClickable.svg

PartnerBadgeClickable.svg

79 ms

Axilweb-logo.svg

Axilweb-logo.svg

1223 ms

man_vr.webp

man_vr.webp

1225 ms

design.png

design.png

1227 ms

development.png

development.png

1366 ms

marketing.png

marketing.png

1445 ms

service-design.webp

service-design.webp

1447 ms

service-development.webp

service-development.webp

1458 ms

service-marketing.webp

service-marketing.webp

1459 ms

service-arvr.webp

service-arvr.webp

1461 ms

crewlix.webp

crewlix.webp

1605 ms

reaffle.webp

reaffle.webp

1690 ms

axilthemes.webp

axilthemes.webp

1622 ms

neIQzCKvrIcn5pbuuuriV9tTSGH2uXo-pQ.ttf

neIQzCKvrIcn5pbuuuriV9tTSGH2uXo-pQ.ttf

45 ms

neINzCKvrIcn5pbuuuriV9tTQJzVqQ.ttf

neINzCKvrIcn5pbuuuriV9tTQJzVqQ.ttf

79 ms

neIQzCKvrIcn5pbuuuriV9tTSDn3uXo-pQ.ttf

neIQzCKvrIcn5pbuuuriV9tTSDn3uXo-pQ.ttf

132 ms

neIQzCKvrIcn5pbuuuriV9tTSE3xuXo-pQ.ttf

neIQzCKvrIcn5pbuuuriV9tTSE3xuXo-pQ.ttf

62 ms

neIQzCKvrIcn5pbuuuriV9tTSCnwuXo-pQ.ttf

neIQzCKvrIcn5pbuuuriV9tTSCnwuXo-pQ.ttf

91 ms

flU8Rqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN5f9XeM.ttf

flU8Rqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN5f9XeM.ttf

61 ms

flUhRqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN58AfvNQKBY.ttf

flUhRqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN58AfvNQKBY.ttf

58 ms

flUhRqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN59Yf_NQKBY.ttf

flUhRqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN59Yf_NQKBY.ttf

73 ms

flUhRqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN59IePNQKBY.ttf

flUhRqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN59IePNQKBY.ttf

74 ms

flUhRqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN59wevNQKBY.ttf

flUhRqu5zY00QEpyWJYWN59wevNQKBY.ttf

74 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

1539 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

1497 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

9 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

1740 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

1865 ms

nwcc-career-college.webp

nwcc-career-college.webp

1713 ms

driving_school.webp

driving_school.webp

1675 ms

reviewer-2.webp

reviewer-2.webp

1550 ms

quote.png

quote.png

1495 ms

dot-colored.svg

dot-colored.svg

1844 ms

light-dots.png

light-dots.png

1827 ms

Accessibility Review

axilweb.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

axilweb.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

axilweb.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Axilweb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Axilweb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

axilweb.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Axilweb. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: