3.3 sec in total
373 ms
2.7 sec
231 ms
Click here to check amazing AXIOM 4 content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about axiom4.com
Providers of quality custom software development. Our developers provide custom software solutions for companies in Missoula, Bozeman, Great Falls, Billings, Helena, Kalispell, Butte and throughout Id...
Visit axiom4.comWe analyzed Axiom4.com page load time and found that the first response time was 373 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
axiom4.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value15.6 s
0/100
25%
Value12.0 s
4/100
10%
Value570 ms
52/100
30%
Value0.023
100/100
15%
Value15.0 s
7/100
10%
373 ms
66 ms
82 ms
136 ms
201 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Axiom4.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (697 ms) belongs to the original domain Axiom4.com.
Page size can be reduced by 249.0 kB (17%)
1.4 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Axiom4.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 679.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 83.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. AXIOM 4 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 72.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 72.5 kB or 18% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Axiom4.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 69.3 kB or 29% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (82%)
68
12
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of AXIOM 4. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.axiom4.com
373 ms
js
66 ms
layerslider.css
82 ms
style.min.css
136 ms
dashboard.css
201 ms
styles.css
204 ms
slider-templates-public.css
210 ms
style.css
275 ms
specular-wpbakery-addons-public.css
272 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
210 ms
shortcodes.css
266 ms
jquery.easy-pie-chart.css
270 ms
swiper.css
280 ms
animate.min.css
282 ms
hoverex-all.css
333 ms
odometer-theme-minimal.css
338 ms
bootstrap.css
339 ms
flexslider.css
337 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
343 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
345 ms
vector-icons.css
400 ms
font-awesome.min.css
403 ms
linecon.css
405 ms
steadysets.css
404 ms
js_composer.min.css
472 ms
jquery.min.js
493 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
464 ms
post-like.js
466 ms
layerslider.utils.js
534 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
607 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
530 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
531 ms
rbtools.min.js
556 ms
rs6.min.js
697 ms
slider-templates-public.js
598 ms
codeless-main.js
598 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
599 ms
css
29 ms
typicons.min.css
624 ms
css
17 ms
rs6.css
590 ms
jquery.appear.js
534 ms
specular-wpbakery-addons-public.js
474 ms
hooks.min.js
500 ms
i18n.min.js
494 ms
index.js
573 ms
index.js
518 ms
bootstrap.min.js
513 ms
jquery.easing.1.1.js
510 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
503 ms
modernizr.custom.66803.js
501 ms
classie.js
565 ms
smoothscroll.js
513 ms
waypoints.min.js
510 ms
background-check.min.js
509 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
504 ms
gtm.js
107 ms
shadow1.png
166 ms
AXIOM-Center-Vertical-NoTagLine-All-Blue.png
233 ms
AXIOM-Center-Vertical-NoTagLine-All-White.png
233 ms
dummy.png
233 ms
PartnerLogos3.png
419 ms
AXIOM-Outside-Sunset-e-2k.jpg
484 ms
www.axiom4.com
219 ms
icon_top.png
278 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
81 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
82 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
102 ms
moon.svg
405 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
331 ms
steadysets.ttf
204 ms
linecons.ttf
265 ms
app.js
97 ms
acsb.js
96 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
11 ms
typicons.woff
208 ms
acsb.js
39 ms
jquery.parallax.js
214 ms
axiom4.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
axiom4.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
axiom4.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Axiom4.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Axiom4.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
axiom4.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of AXIOM 4. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: