2.8 sec in total
185 ms
2.5 sec
67 ms
Click here to check amazing Ayagon content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ayagon.cl
Visit ayagon.clWe analyzed Ayagon.cl page load time and found that the first response time was 185 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
ayagon.cl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
79/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value3.6 s
86/100
10%
Value1,190 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value14.3 s
9/100
10%
185 ms
36 ms
32 ms
1090 ms
21 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ayagon.cl, 43% (25 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 29% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 560.3 kB (51%)
1.1 MB
531.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Ayagon.cl main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 507.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 405.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 405.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 101.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ayagon needs image optimization as it can save up to 101.5 kB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 53.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 53.8 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (25%)
40
30
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ayagon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ayagon.cl
185 ms
minified.js
36 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
32 ms
polyfill.min.js
1090 ms
thunderbolt-commons.45c6b033.bundle.min.js
21 ms
main.03939386.bundle.min.js
57 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
20 ms
lodash.min.js
57 ms
react.production.min.js
20 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
58 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
56 ms
Logo.png
200 ms
0d8bd4_d24d513a93504108a11a7b6c75a54885~mv2.png
384 ms
iconoexperiencia.png
529 ms
0d8bd4_2b7b43d7b5614c248c6647579a7ce30c~mv2.png
423 ms
0d8bd4_8dc58e2cbe10411eb184aec7b25d26d8~mv2.png
424 ms
0d8bd4_f07525e3b4d046ffa26778318d48124d~mv2.png
397 ms
Iso9001.png
386 ms
FotoCertif.png
546 ms
jomar.png
611 ms
mts.png
584 ms
tupy.png
582 ms
bundor.png
594 ms
oinb.png
741 ms
sfinternational.png
713 ms
kunkle.png
754 ms
codelco.png
763 ms
enap.png
760 ms
SQM.png
887 ms
valvula.png
892 ms
flange.png
928 ms
codo.png
953 ms
copla.png
915 ms
niples.png
963 ms
0d8bd4_f09a224182124606b36be0b683081aef~mv2.png
983 ms
Iso9001.png
998 ms
bundle.min.js
59 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.woff
49 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
49 ms
150 ms
149 ms
148 ms
148 ms
140 ms
142 ms
177 ms
173 ms
170 ms
170 ms
170 ms
170 ms
deprecation-es.v5.html
7 ms
bolt-performance
30 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
7 ms
right-arrow.svg
24 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
5 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
5 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
5 ms
ayagon.cl accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ayagon.cl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ayagon.cl SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ayagon.cl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ayagon.cl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ayagon.cl
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ayagon. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: