Tools & Wizards About Us
azimuthcommunications.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

azimuthcommunications.com

IES Communications, LLC | Low-Voltage | United States

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

60 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

59 ms

azimuthcommunications.com screenshot

About Website

Visit azimuthcommunications.com now to see the best up-to-date Azimuth Communications content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about azimuthcommunications.com

IES Communications, LLC (Integrated Electrical Services) We are the national leading provider of communications technology, systems, and services. IES Communications, LLC; The right team to get the jo...

Visit azimuthcommunications.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Azimuthcommunications.com page load time and found that the first response time was 60 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

azimuthcommunications.com performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value440 ms

64/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.9 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.iescomm.com

60 ms

minified.js

33 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

28 ms

polyfill.min.js

66 ms

thunderbolt-commons.2ae1974e.bundle.min.js

126 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Azimuthcommunications.com, 28% (13 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 26% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (580 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 743.1 kB (59%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

513.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Azimuthcommunications.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 854.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 672.4 kB

  • Original 854.0 kB
  • After minification 852.2 kB
  • After compression 181.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 672.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 22.6 kB

  • Original 110.2 kB
  • After minification 87.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Azimuth Communications needs image optimization as it can save up to 22.6 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 48.1 kB

  • Original 292.8 kB
  • After minification 292.8 kB
  • After compression 244.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (25%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

30

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Azimuth Communications. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.iescomm.com

www.iescomm.com

60 ms

minified.js

minified.js

33 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

28 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

66 ms

thunderbolt-commons.2ae1974e.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.2ae1974e.bundle.min.js

126 ms

main.8ce05abc.bundle.min.js

main.8ce05abc.bundle.min.js

128 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

129 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

143 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

143 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

143 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

142 ms

IES%20Communications%20Logo-RGB.png

IES%20Communications%20Logo-RGB.png

276 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

78 ms

DIR%20logo_Name_Blue.png

DIR%20logo_Name_Blue.png

358 ms

New%20Sidebar%20right.png

New%20Sidebar%20right.png

413 ms

New%20Sidebar%20right.png

New%20Sidebar%20right.png

423 ms

75f28f_0f49b45a8a3a4211963b325563e451d6f000.jpg

75f28f_0f49b45a8a3a4211963b325563e451d6f000.jpg

338 ms

43c038_3c44a5c71ce7443c90beb643371640fc~mv1.png

43c038_3c44a5c71ce7443c90beb643371640fc~mv1.png

310 ms

43c038_2d1f793adeff4f5b8492b7b13ac0e490~mv1.png

43c038_2d1f793adeff4f5b8492b7b13ac0e490~mv1.png

308 ms

6a4d6f_817e49502b4744ca88e3ffe9bc797627~mv2.png

6a4d6f_817e49502b4744ca88e3ffe9bc797627~mv2.png

453 ms

6a4d6f_ebfdde6a03d34993b242cfe07201cb22~mv2.png

6a4d6f_ebfdde6a03d34993b242cfe07201cb22~mv2.png

512 ms

6a4d6f_0014ab063e3544a5914eb8b501d714c0~mv2.png

6a4d6f_0014ab063e3544a5914eb8b501d714c0~mv2.png

574 ms

6a4d6f_fce039744fb24c58a385f944ef3ff60c~mv2.png

6a4d6f_fce039744fb24c58a385f944ef3ff60c~mv2.png

545 ms

6a4d6f_807d865434804995a34276e041a3920c~mv2.png

6a4d6f_807d865434804995a34276e041a3920c~mv2.png

580 ms

6a4d6f_3b356b3132644394b09b7848b4aaedee~mv2.png

6a4d6f_3b356b3132644394b09b7848b4aaedee~mv2.png

569 ms

148 ms

150 ms

151 ms

142 ms

143 ms

139 ms

181 ms

185 ms

183 ms

182 ms

187 ms

185 ms

61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff

61bd362e-7162-46bd-b67e-28f366c4afbe.woff

8 ms

AvenirLTW05-85Heavy.woff

AvenirLTW05-85Heavy.woff

15 ms

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

908c4810-64db-4b46-bb8e-823eb41f68c0.woff

15 ms

AvenirLTW05-35Light.woff

AvenirLTW05-35Light.woff

14 ms

03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff

03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff

7 ms

80c34ad2-27c2-4d99-90fa-985fd64ab81a.woff

80c34ad2-27c2-4d99-90fa-985fd64ab81a.woff

14 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

5 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

24 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

6 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

5 ms

Accessibility Review

azimuthcommunications.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

azimuthcommunications.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

azimuthcommunications.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Azimuthcommunications.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Azimuthcommunications.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

azimuthcommunications.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Azimuth Communications. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: