Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

bossa.aftership.com

Track order status - Bossa Store

Page Load Speed

940 ms in total

First Response

59 ms

Resources Loaded

758 ms

Page Rendered

123 ms

bossa.aftership.com screenshot

About Website

Visit bossa.aftership.com now to see the best up-to-date Bossa Aftership content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about bossa.aftership.com

Track delivery status of your packages. Powered by AfterShip.

Visit bossa.aftership.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Bossa.aftership.com page load time and found that the first response time was 59 ms and then it took 881 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

bossa.aftership.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

87/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,660 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.088

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.5 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

bossa.aftership.com

59 ms

styles-334d1387f5dee1f9f62d8575733ffc28.css

26 ms

style-bd683ec66357376ee2d114464ca5eafb.css

16 ms

modernizr-2.7.1-respond-1.4.2.min-2521cee107498c65e4186461f3f4e04a.js

21 ms

jquery.min.js

64 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 33% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Bossa.aftership.com, 24% (5 requests) were made to Button.aftership.com and 19% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (276 ms) relates to the external source Button.aftership.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.8 kB (39%)

Content Size

94.4 kB

After Optimization

57.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Bossa.aftership.com main page is 94.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 90.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 3.5 kB
  • After minification 3.4 kB
  • After compression 1.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.0 kB or 57% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 34.8 kB

  • Original 90.9 kB
  • After minification 90.9 kB
  • After compression 56.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.8 kB or 38% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (69%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Bossa Aftership. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

bossa.aftership.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

bossa.aftership.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

bossa.aftership.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Bossa.aftership.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Bossa.aftership.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Bossa Aftership. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: