Tools & Wizards About Us
display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

Latest Trends in Display Technology | Applied Technology Review

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

151 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

198 ms

display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Display Tech Applied Technology Review best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

Applied technology review provides the latest technology news, insights, articles and updates on the trends in display technology. Also listing top display Technology companies.

Visit display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 151 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value910 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.19

64/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.5 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

151 ms

display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

434 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

300 ms

style.css

306 ms

style1.css

319 ms

Our browser made a total of 105 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com, 60% (63 requests) were made to Appliedtechnologyreview.com and 8% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (762 ms) relates to the external source Appliedtechnologyreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 434.0 kB (31%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

946.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 710.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 67.7 kB

  • Original 88.3 kB
  • After minification 85.6 kB
  • After compression 20.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 67.7 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 266.7 kB
  • After minification 264.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Display Tech Applied Technology Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 167.4 kB

  • Original 710.2 kB
  • After minification 709.9 kB
  • After compression 542.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 167.4 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 196.8 kB

  • Original 314.8 kB
  • After minification 292.1 kB
  • After compression 117.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 196.8 kB or 63% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (71%)

Requests Now

89

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Display Tech Applied Technology Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

151 ms

display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

434 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

300 ms

style.css

style.css

306 ms

style1.css

style1.css

319 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

394 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

331 ms

animate.css

animate.css

335 ms

hover-min.css

hover-min.css

135 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

356 ms

meanmenu.min.css

meanmenu.min.css

362 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

378 ms

lightbox.min.css

lightbox.min.css

400 ms

style.css

style.css

468 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

414 ms

style.css

style.css

419 ms

social_sharing.css

social_sharing.css

438 ms

site.css

site.css

453 ms

css

css

65 ms

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

453 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

140 ms

js

js

141 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

141 ms

element.js

element.js

124 ms

menu.css

menu.css

471 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

476 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

63 ms

main4906_v1.css

main4906_v1.css

674 ms

skins4906.css

skins4906.css

617 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

617 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

87 ms

search.js

search.js

623 ms

jolly-menu.js

jolly-menu.js

623 ms

cio.js

cio.js

623 ms

main4906_v1.css

main4906_v1.css

623 ms

base4906.css

base4906.css

147 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

90 ms

css

css

70 ms

jquery.flipbox.css

jquery.flipbox.css

148 ms

cube_slider.css

cube_slider.css

202 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

93 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

729 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

729 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

733 ms

jquery.meanmenu.js

jquery.meanmenu.js

733 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

733 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

732 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

746 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

746 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

745 ms

lightbox.min.js

lightbox.min.js

762 ms

main.js

main.js

762 ms

jqueryscripttop.css

jqueryscripttop.css

45 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

509 ms

custom.js

custom.js

611 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

599 ms

custom.js

custom.js

583 ms

css

css

13 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

296 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

164 ms

close.png

close.png

402 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

403 ms

prev.png

prev.png

404 ms

next.png

next.png

407 ms

ATRNewlogo.svg

ATRNewlogo.svg

407 ms

toggleIcon.png

toggleIcon.png

409 ms

370x420_6Ef7.gif

370x420_6Ef7.gif

527 ms

9141e370.gif

9141e370.gif

526 ms

mg17r370.gif

mg17r370.gif

526 ms

nl7x5370.gif

nl7x5370.gif

611 ms

450x308_pYC9.1

450x308_pYC9.1

519 ms

370x420_1W8n.gif

370x420_1W8n.gif

609 ms

370x420_LnaJ.gif

370x420_LnaJ.gif

611 ms

370x420_ITp1.gif

370x420_ITp1.gif

612 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

486 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

232 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

62 ms

450x308_r8TW.png

450x308_r8TW.png

501 ms

450x308_s53A.webp

450x308_s53A.webp

448 ms

m25cvRanking.jpg

m25cvRanking.jpg

449 ms

5g18display.jpg

5g18display.jpg

714 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

715 ms

x.png

x.png

715 ms

css

css

115 ms

ads

ads

129 ms

container.html

container.html

41 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

29 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

40 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

113 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

473 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

480 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

114 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

113 ms

css

css

20 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

19 ms

4184872897701965849

4184872897701965849

281 ms

icon.png

icon.png

276 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

280 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

280 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

93 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

73 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

72 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

72 ms

ads

ads

54 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

73 ms

Accessibility Review

display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

display-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Display Tech Applied Technology Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: