Tools & Wizards About Us
fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com

Fire Protection Technology News | Applied Technology Review

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

135 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

146 ms

fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Fire Protection Applied Technology Review content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com

Applied technology review provides the latest technology news, insights, articles and updates on the latest trends in fire protection technology. Also listing top fire protection technology companies ...

Visit fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 135 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,420 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.256

48/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.1 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com

135 ms

fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com

518 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

277 ms

style.css

287 ms

style1.css

287 ms

Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com, 58% (59 requests) were made to Appliedtechnologyreview.com and 8% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (866 ms) relates to the external source Appliedtechnologyreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 190.0 kB (14%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 710.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 65.4 kB

  • Original 85.7 kB
  • After minification 82.9 kB
  • After compression 20.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 303.4 kB
  • After minification 302.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fire Protection Applied Technology Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 16.8 kB

  • Original 710.1 kB
  • After minification 709.7 kB
  • After compression 693.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 106.4 kB

  • Original 224.3 kB
  • After minification 201.6 kB
  • After compression 117.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 106.4 kB or 47% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (73%)

Requests Now

86

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fire Protection Applied Technology Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com

fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com

135 ms

fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com

fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com

518 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

277 ms

style.css

style.css

287 ms

style1.css

style1.css

287 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

377 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

301 ms

animate.css

animate.css

316 ms

hover-min.css

hover-min.css

128 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

335 ms

meanmenu.min.css

meanmenu.min.css

370 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

364 ms

lightbox.min.css

lightbox.min.css

385 ms

style.css

style.css

449 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

393 ms

style.css

style.css

426 ms

social_sharing.css

social_sharing.css

433 ms

site.css

site.css

438 ms

css

css

44 ms

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

440 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

130 ms

js

js

94 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

115 ms

element.js

element.js

78 ms

menu.css

menu.css

453 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

610 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

46 ms

main4906_v1.css

main4906_v1.css

685 ms

skins4906.css

skins4906.css

683 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

684 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

53 ms

search.js

search.js

633 ms

jolly-menu.js

jolly-menu.js

633 ms

cio.js

cio.js

632 ms

main4906_v1.css

main4906_v1.css

774 ms

base4906.css

base4906.css

133 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

54 ms

css

css

38 ms

jquery.flipbox.css

jquery.flipbox.css

160 ms

cube_slider.css

cube_slider.css

187 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

59 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

772 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

736 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

741 ms

jquery.meanmenu.js

jquery.meanmenu.js

733 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

734 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

769 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

770 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

769 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

769 ms

lightbox.min.js

lightbox.min.js

863 ms

main.js

main.js

866 ms

jqueryscripttop.css

jqueryscripttop.css

31 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

654 ms

custom.js

custom.js

643 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

644 ms

custom.js

custom.js

628 ms

css

css

14 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

313 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

194 ms

close.png

close.png

443 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

459 ms

prev.png

prev.png

459 ms

next.png

next.png

459 ms

ATRNewlogo.svg

ATRNewlogo.svg

459 ms

toggleIcon.png

toggleIcon.png

459 ms

450x308_4Q5W.webp

450x308_4Q5W.webp

565 ms

370x420_1WvE.jpg

370x420_1WvE.jpg

566 ms

370x420_Pbe5.jpg

370x420_Pbe5.jpg

647 ms

114x81_eg8R.webp

114x81_eg8R.webp

566 ms

450x308_u0Y5.jpg

450x308_u0Y5.jpg

567 ms

450x308_YJgW.jpg

450x308_YJgW.jpg

567 ms

7tmafaward.jpg

7tmafaward.jpg

649 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

523 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

264 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

79 ms

8cipbcover.jpg

8cipbcover.jpg

795 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

452 ms

x.png

x.png

452 ms

css

css

139 ms

ads

ads

135 ms

container.html

container.html

38 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

37 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

44 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

119 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

211 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

547 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

120 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

118 ms

css

css

32 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

17 ms

6085867253428176253

6085867253428176253

347 ms

icon.png

icon.png

343 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

347 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

347 ms

ufs_web_display.js

ufs_web_display.js

88 ms

ads

ads

71 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

15 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

14 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

84 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

86 ms

Accessibility Review

fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fire-protection.appliedtechnologyreview.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fire Protection Applied Technology Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: