Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

inboundwriter.appappeal.com

Business Software Reviews, SaaS & Cloud Applications Directory | GetApp®

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

252 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

826 ms

inboundwriter.appappeal.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to inboundwriter.appappeal.com homepage info - get ready to check Inboundwriter App Eal best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about inboundwriter.appappeal.com

Review, Compare and Evaluate small business software. GetApp has software offers, SaaS and Cloud Apps, independent evaluations and reviews

Visit inboundwriter.appappeal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Inboundwriter.appappeal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 252 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inboundwriter.appappeal.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

inboundwriter.appappeal.com

252 ms

plusone.js

301 ms

appappeal-b5fa26fea79c7e239ca2e29f878ab915c14e6782a61ddfe73084dbd72891c299.css

70 ms

search_bar-e6940aec0306d36d86505d17ccd266f60c935e0faf81d7d0a750b70e0ccebce0.css

69 ms

widgets.js

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 118 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Inboundwriter.appappeal.com, 9% (11 requests) were made to Dvbpuf8cvr5ou.cloudfront.net and 8% (10 requests) were made to A.disquscdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.syndication.twimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (56%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

964.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Inboundwriter.appappeal.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 54.1 kB

  • Original 74.5 kB
  • After minification 72.6 kB
  • After compression 20.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.1 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 61.7 kB

  • Original 448.9 kB
  • After minification 387.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Inboundwriter App Eal needs image optimization as it can save up to 61.7 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 814.6 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 494.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 814.6 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 303.4 kB

  • Original 366.0 kB
  • After minification 365.1 kB
  • After compression 62.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inboundwriter.appappeal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 303.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (51%)

Requests Now

111

After Optimization

54

The browser has sent 111 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inboundwriter App Eal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

inboundwriter.appappeal.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inboundwriter.appappeal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inboundwriter.appappeal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Inboundwriter App Eal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: