Tools & Wizards About Us
naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 72

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com

Aerospace and Defense Review: Business and Technology Magazine

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

157 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

75 ms

naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Naval Tech Aerospace Defense Review content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com

Aerospace and Defense Review is a print and digital magazine that provides business and technology news, innovative business practices, advanced technologies in trend, and solutions to affecting the a...

Visit naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 157 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

63/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,810 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.267

46/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.8 s

17/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com

157 ms

naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com

448 ms

bootstrap.min.css

136 ms

animate.css

266 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

266 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com, 66% (43 requests) were made to Aerospacedefensereview.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (763 ms) relates to the external source Aerospacedefensereview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 130.9 kB (20%)

Content Size

650.7 kB

After Optimization

519.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com main page is 650.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 399.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 61.7 kB

  • Original 77.9 kB
  • After minification 76.8 kB
  • After compression 16.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 66.5 kB
  • After minification 56.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Naval Tech Aerospace Defense Review needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.3 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 12.5 kB

  • Original 399.0 kB
  • After minification 395.5 kB
  • After compression 386.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 46.4 kB

  • Original 107.2 kB
  • After minification 82.2 kB
  • After compression 60.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 46.4 kB or 43% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (85%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Naval Tech Aerospace Defense Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com

naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com

157 ms

naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com

naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com

448 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

136 ms

animate.css

animate.css

266 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

266 ms

bootstrap-select.min.css

bootstrap-select.min.css

273 ms

bootstrap-datepicker.min.css

bootstrap-datepicker.min.css

280 ms

default.css

default.css

291 ms

preloader.css

preloader.css

293 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

322 ms

playeraudio.css

playeraudio.css

324 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css

334 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

342 ms

meanmenu.min.css

meanmenu.min.css

350 ms

youtubepopup.css

youtubepopup.css

354 ms

header.css

header.css

381 ms

slider.css

slider.css

383 ms

footer.css

footer.css

394 ms

post.css

post.css

404 ms

shop.css

shop.css

411 ms

style.css

style.css

418 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

439 ms

custom.css

custom.css

442 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

82 ms

style-customizer.css

style-customizer.css

455 ms

css

css

87 ms

breakingNews.css

breakingNews.css

465 ms

css

css

102 ms

style1.css

style1.css

470 ms

jQuery.js

jQuery.js

547 ms

breakingNews.js

breakingNews.js

496 ms

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

500 ms

js

js

103 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

163 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

176 ms

element.js

element.js

115 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

513 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

276 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

526 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

534 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

763 ms

main.js

main.js

688 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

689 ms

custom.js

custom.js

689 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

688 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

81 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

689 ms

custom.js

custom.js

688 ms

css

css

14 ms

close.png

close.png

110 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

111 ms

prev.png

prev.png

112 ms

next.png

next.png

182 ms

Aerospace-logo-new.png

Aerospace-logo-new.png

421 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

182 ms

x.png

x.png

228 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

168 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

320 ms

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

126 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

240 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

239 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

241 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

171 ms

ads

ads

118 ms

container.html

container.html

118 ms

Accessibility Review

naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com SEO score

72

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

naval-tech.aerospacedefensereview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Naval Tech Aerospace Defense Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: