Report Summary

  • 86

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

pressreader-alternate.app.link

PressReader.com - Digital Newspaper & Magazine Subscriptions

Page Load Speed

588 ms in total

First Response

9 ms

Resources Loaded

504 ms

Page Rendered

75 ms

pressreader-alternate.app.link screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Press Reader Alternate App content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about pressreader-alternate.app.link

Digital newsstand featuring 7000+ of the world’s most popular newspapers & magazines. Enjoy unlimited reading on up to 5 devices with 7-day free trial.

Visit pressreader-alternate.app.link

Key Findings

We analyzed Pressreader-alternate.app.link page load time and found that the first response time was 9 ms and then it took 579 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pressreader-alternate.app.link performance score

86

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

62/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

62/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pressreader-alternate.app.link

9 ms

www.pressreader.com

161 ms

WebResource.ashx

38 ms

es6-shim.min.js

27 ms

app.build.min.js

100 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Pressreader-alternate.app.link, 40% (4 requests) were made to R.prcdn.co and 20% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (161 ms) relates to the external source Pressreader.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 11.2 kB (2%)

Content Size

567.6 kB

After Optimization

556.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Pressreader-alternate.app.link main page is 567.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 550.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 11.2 kB

  • Original 17.1 kB
  • After minification 16.4 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.2 kB or 65% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 550.5 kB
  • After minification 550.5 kB
  • After compression 550.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Press Reader Alternate App. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

pressreader-alternate.app.link accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

pressreader-alternate.app.link best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

pressreader-alternate.app.link SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pressreader-alternate.app.link can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pressreader-alternate.app.link main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Press Reader Alternate App. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: