Tools & Wizards About Us
rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

Latest News In Rugged Technology | Applied Technology Review

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

140 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

202 ms

rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Rugged Tech Applied Technology Review content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

Applied technology review provides the latest technology news, insights, articles and updates on the latest trends in Rugged Technology. Also listing top Rugged Technology companies.

Visit rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 140 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

42/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value990 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.9 s

13/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

140 ms

rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

473 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

260 ms

style.css

273 ms

style1.css

285 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com, 66% (63 requests) were made to Appliedtechnologyreview.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (855 ms) relates to the external source Appliedtechnologyreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 337.2 kB (21%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 849.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 64.8 kB

  • Original 84.0 kB
  • After minification 81.3 kB
  • After compression 19.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 849.4 kB
  • After minification 847.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rugged Tech Applied Technology Review images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 74.0 kB

  • Original 376.7 kB
  • After minification 376.4 kB
  • After compression 302.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 74.0 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 196.8 kB

  • Original 314.8 kB
  • After minification 292.1 kB
  • After compression 117.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 196.8 kB or 63% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (69%)

Requests Now

89

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rugged Tech Applied Technology Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

140 ms

rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

473 ms

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

jQuery.verticalCarousel.css

260 ms

style.css

style.css

273 ms

style1.css

style1.css

285 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

470 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

354 ms

animate.css

animate.css

424 ms

hover-min.css

hover-min.css

288 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

310 ms

meanmenu.min.css

meanmenu.min.css

331 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

344 ms

lightbox.min.css

lightbox.min.css

368 ms

style.css

style.css

570 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

465 ms

style.css

style.css

416 ms

social_sharing.css

social_sharing.css

426 ms

site.css

site.css

478 ms

css

css

80 ms

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

489 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

137 ms

js

js

114 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

127 ms

element.js

element.js

89 ms

menu.css

menu.css

480 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

526 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

77 ms

main4906_v1.css

main4906_v1.css

831 ms

skins4906.css

skins4906.css

538 ms

new_region.css

new_region.css

536 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

77 ms

search.js

search.js

494 ms

jolly-menu.js

jolly-menu.js

529 ms

cio.js

cio.js

770 ms

main4906_v1.css

main4906_v1.css

855 ms

base4906.css

base4906.css

160 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

82 ms

css

css

52 ms

jquery.flipbox.css

jquery.flipbox.css

202 ms

cube_slider.css

cube_slider.css

210 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

75 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

847 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

768 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

846 ms

jquery.meanmenu.js

jquery.meanmenu.js

770 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

847 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

845 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.js

jquery.magnific-popup.js

845 ms

jquery.counterup.min.js

jquery.counterup.min.js

850 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

848 ms

lightbox.min.js

lightbox.min.js

847 ms

main.js

main.js

849 ms

jqueryscripttop.css

jqueryscripttop.css

26 ms

jquery_cookie.js

jquery_cookie.js

659 ms

custom.js

custom.js

829 ms

jquery.easy-ticker.js

jquery.easy-ticker.js

818 ms

custom.js

custom.js

789 ms

css

css

20 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

334 ms

atrk.js

atrk.js

196 ms

close.png

close.png

458 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

458 ms

prev.png

prev.png

457 ms

next.png

next.png

544 ms

ATRNewlogo.svg

ATRNewlogo.svg

543 ms

toggleIcon.png

toggleIcon.png

543 ms

450x308_582r.jpg

450x308_582r.jpg

544 ms

370x420_y15Z.jpg

370x420_y15Z.jpg

544 ms

370x420_E786.jpg

370x420_E786.jpg

541 ms

370x420_QyIe.jpg

370x420_QyIe.jpg

547 ms

450x308_fIFH.jpg

450x308_fIFH.jpg

545 ms

450x308_67p3.jpg

450x308_67p3.jpg

682 ms

370x420_H9pU.jpg

370x420_H9pU.jpg

682 ms

370x420_1C03.jpg

370x420_1C03.jpg

576 ms

370x420_z16l.jpg

370x420_z16l.jpg

545 ms

370x420_2Eob.jpg

370x420_2Eob.jpg

761 ms

jdt6Ranking.jpg

jdt6Ranking.jpg

591 ms

gpg0ccover.jpg

gpg0ccover.jpg

591 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

86 ms

linkedin_cirr.png

linkedin_cirr.png

494 ms

x.png

x.png

494 ms

css

css

151 ms

ads

ads

148 ms

container.html

container.html

39 ms

font

font

25 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

128 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

207 ms

font

font

28 ms

css

css

22 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

14 ms

6085867253428176253

6085867253428176253

81 ms

icon.png

icon.png

75 ms

abg_lite.js

abg_lite.js

79 ms

window_focus.js

window_focus.js

80 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

134 ms

font

font

23 ms

Accessibility Review

rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rugged-tech.appliedtechnologyreview.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rugged Tech Applied Technology Review. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: